» Articles » PMID: 23264345

Perfusion CT in Acute Stroke: a Comprehensive Analysis of Infarct and Penumbra

Overview
Journal Radiology
Specialty Radiology
Date 2012 Dec 25
PMID 23264345
Citations 106
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To perform a large-scale systematic comparison of the accuracy of all commonly used perfusion computed tomography (CT) data postprocessing methods in the definition of infarct core and penumbra in acute stroke.

Materials And Methods: The collection of data for this study was approved by the institutional ethics committee, and all patients gave informed consent. Three hundred fourteen patients with hemispheric ischemia underwent perfusion CT within 6 hours of stroke symptom onset and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging at 24 hours. CT perfusion maps were generated by using six different postprocessing methods. Pixel-based analysis was used to calculate sensitivity and specificity of different perfusion CT thresholds for the penumbra and infarct core with each postprocessing method, and receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves were plotted. Area under the ROC curve (AUC) analysis was used to define the optimum threshold.

Results: Delay-corrected singular value deconvolution (SVD) with a delay time of more than 2 seconds most accurately defined the penumbra (AUC = 0.86, P = .046, mean volume difference between acute perfusion CT and 24-hour diffusion-weighted MR imaging = 1.7 mL). A double core threshold with a delay time of more than 2 seconds and cerebral blood flow less than 40% provided the most accurate definition of the infarct core (AUC = 0.86, P = .038). The other SVD measures (block circulant, nondelay corrected) were more accurate than non-SVD methods.

Conclusion: This study has shown that there is marked variability in penumbra and infarct prediction among various deconvolution techniques and highlights the need for standardization of perfusion CT in stroke.

Supplemental Material: http://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.12120971/-/DC1.

Citing Articles

A deep learning approach versus expert clinician panel in the classification of posterior circulation infarction.

Edwards L, Visser M, Cappelen-Smith C, Cordato D, Bivard A, Churilov L Neuroimage Clin. 2025; 45:103732.

PMID: 39826393 PMC: 11786091. DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2025.103732.


Deep learning biomarker of chronometric and biological ischemic stroke lesion age from unenhanced CT.

Marcus A, Mair G, Chen L, Hallett C, Cuervas-Mons C, Roi D NPJ Digit Med. 2024; 7(1):338.

PMID: 39643604 PMC: 11624201. DOI: 10.1038/s41746-024-01325-z.


Analysis of the role of perfusion parameters in predicting rupture of brain arteriovenous malformations: a multi-center study.

Guo Y, Zhang S, Sun S, Zhang Q, Zhai Y, Wang X Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):25566.

PMID: 39462139 PMC: 11513006. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-77316-7.


Effect of MR-guided perfusion imaging mismatch profiles within 6 h on endovascular thrombectomy outcomes.

Li X, Lu Z, Li S, Zhu L, Jiang T, Sun H Neurol Sci. 2024; 46(1):285-293.

PMID: 39242369 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-024-07751-x.


Effects of intracranial artery stenosis of anterior circulation on cognition-A CT perfusion-based study.

Yin S, Zhang Y, Du B, Cao S, Wang K, Wei Q Brain Behav. 2024; 14(9):e3521.

PMID: 39236078 PMC: 11376367. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.3521.