» Articles » PMID: 23263917

Features of High Quality Discharge Planning for Patients Following Acute Myocardial Infarction

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2012 Dec 25
PMID 23263917
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Hospital discharge planning is required as a Medicare Condition of Participation (CoP), and is essential to the health and safety for all patients. However, there have been no studies examining specific hospital discharge processes, such as patient education and communication with primary care providers, in relation to hospital 30-day risk standardized mortality rates (RSMRs) for patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI).

Objective: To identify hospital discharge processes that may be associated with better performance in hospital AMI care as measured by RSMR.

Design: We conducted a qualitative study of U.S. Hospitals, which were selected based on their RSMR reported by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Hospital Compare website for the most recent data available (January 1, 2005 - December 31, 2007). We selected hospitals that ranked in the top 5 % and the bottom 5 % of RSMR for the two consecutive years. We focused on hospitals at the extreme ends of the range in RSMR, known as deviant case sampling. We excluded hospitals that did not have the ability to perform percutaneous coronary intervention in order to decrease the heterogeneity in our sample.

Participants: Participants included key hospital clinical and administrative staff most involved in discharge planning for patients admitted with AMI.

Methods: We conducted 14 site visits and 57 in-depth interviews using a standard discussion guide. We employed a grounded theory approach and used the constant comparative method to generate recurrent and unifying themes.

Key Results: We identified five broad discharge processes that distinguished higher and lower performing hospitals: 1) initiating discharge planning upon patient admission; 2) using multidisciplinary case management services; 3) ensuring that a follow-up plan is in place prior to discharge; 4) providing focused education sessions for both the patient and family; and 5) contacting the primary care physician regarding the patient's hospitalization and follow-up care plan.

Conclusion: Comprehensive and more intense discharge processes that start on admission continue during the patient's hospital stay, and follow up with the primary care physician within 2 days post-discharge, may be critical in reducing hospital RSMR for patients with AMI.

Citing Articles

How do hospitals that serve low socioeconomic status patients achieve low readmission rates? A qualitative study of safety-net hospitals.

Minges K, Chen P, Loh K, Sutton L, Bernheim S BMJ Open. 2025; 15(2):e083384.

PMID: 39947820 PMC: 11831259. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083384.


The use of positive deviance approach to improve health service delivery and quality of care: a scoping review.

Kassie A, Eakin E, Abate B, Endalamaw A, Zewdie A, Wolka E BMC Health Serv Res. 2024; 24(1):438.

PMID: 38589897 PMC: 11003118. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10850-2.


What is the mind map of the hospital's future changes in a developing country like Iran? A qualitative study.

Masoud A, Dehnavieh R, Yazdi-Feyzabadi V, Poursheikhali A, Noori Hekmat S, Kazemi M BMC Health Serv Res. 2023; 23(1):732.

PMID: 37407977 PMC: 10324238. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09507-3.


Reducing the Length of Stay by Enhancing the Patient Discharge Process: Using Quality Improvement Tools to Optimize Hospital Efficiency.

Abuzied Y, Maymani H, AlMatouq B, AlDosary O Glob J Qual Saf Healthc. 2023; 4(1):44-49.

PMID: 37260536 PMC: 10229011. DOI: 10.36401/JQSH-20-27.


Trends in Medical and Surgical Admission Length of Stay by Race/Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status: A Time Series Analysis.

Ghosh A, Unruh M, Soroka O, Shapiro M Health Serv Res Manag Epidemiol. 2021; 8:23333928211035581.

PMID: 34377740 PMC: 8330458. DOI: 10.1177/23333928211035581.


References
1.
Helfrich C, Li Y, Sharp N, Sales A . Organizational readiness to change assessment (ORCA): development of an instrument based on the Promoting Action on Research in Health Services (PARIHS) framework. Implement Sci. 2009; 4:38. PMC: 2716295. DOI: 10.1186/1748-5908-4-38. View

2.
OMahony S, Mazur E, Charney P, Wang Y, Fine J . Use of multidisciplinary rounds to simultaneously improve quality outcomes, enhance resident education, and shorten length of stay. J Gen Intern Med. 2007; 22(8):1073-9. PMC: 2305734. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-007-0225-1. View

3.
Krumholz H, Wang Y, Mattera J, Wang Y, Han L, Ingber M . An administrative claims model suitable for profiling hospital performance based on 30-day mortality rates among patients with an acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2006; 113(13):1683-92. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.611186. View

4.
Krumholz H, Merrill A, Schone E, Schreiner G, Chen J, Bradley E . Patterns of hospital performance in acute myocardial infarction and heart failure 30-day mortality and readmission. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2009; 2(5):407-13. DOI: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.109.883256. View

5.
Curry L, Spatz E, Cherlin E, Thompson J, Berg D, Ting H . What distinguishes top-performing hospitals in acute myocardial infarction mortality rates? A qualitative study. Ann Intern Med. 2011; 154(6):384-90. PMC: 4735872. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-6-201103150-00003. View