» Articles » PMID: 23263289

Oncology Drug Development and Approval of Systemic Anticancer Therapy by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration

Overview
Journal Oncologist
Specialty Oncology
Date 2012 Dec 25
PMID 23263289
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Regulatory approval of oncology drugs is the cornerstone of the development process and approval characteristics shape eventual utilization. Approval trends and characteristics provide valuable information for drug developers and regulators and ultimately affect clinicians and patients.

Methods: Indication characteristics were tabulated for drugs approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for systemic therapy of malignancies from 1949 through October 2011. Variables included time to approval, initial/supplemental indication, tumor type, stage of disease, specification of protein expression or genetic information, drug class, trial design, concomitant agent, trial size, and endpoint.

Results: A total of 121 unique anticancer agents, including 242 unique indications, were approved. The number of trials for each indication has decreased; however, trial size has increased and more randomized controlled trials have been performed. Trial designs have increasingly used time-to-event endpoints and rarely have used symptom-based primary endpoints. Approvals have been primarily single agent, with less emphasis on palliative treatments and increasing emphasis on advanced disease stages and requirements for prior therapy. Molecular specifications in labels have increased, but they are present in less than 30% of recent indications and are not associated with shorter approval times.

Conclusion: Approval of oncology agents is occurring in increasingly more challenging settings, suggesting gaps between eventual practice and development in potentially suboptimal indications. Molecular specifications promise to enhance development, yet widespread use in label indications has not yet been achieved.

Citing Articles

Review of Clinical Equipoise: Examples from Oncology Trials.

AlHamaly M, Alzoubi K, Khabour O, Jaber R, Aldelaimy W Curr Rev Clin Exp Pharmacol. 2021; 18(1):22-30.

PMID: 34939559 PMC: 9992762. DOI: 10.2174/2772432817666211221164101.


Clinical endpoints in oncology - a primer.

Delgado A, Guddati A Am J Cancer Res. 2021; 11(4):1121-1131.

PMID: 33948349 PMC: 8085844.


Optimized Image-Based Surrogate Endpoints in Targeted Therapies for Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Phase III Randomized Controlled Trials.

Suh C, Kim H, Jung S, Gon Choi C, Kim S, Kim K Korean J Radiol. 2020; 21(4):471-482.

PMID: 32193895 PMC: 7082650. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2019.0839.


Medicinal Plants from Brazilian Cerrado: Antioxidant and Anticancer Potential and Protection against Chemotherapy Toxicity.

de Giffoni de Carvalho J, Baldivia D, Leite D, de Araujo L, Espindola P, Antunes K Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2019; 2019:3685264.

PMID: 31534620 PMC: 6732650. DOI: 10.1155/2019/3685264.


Generating Real-World Tumor Burden Endpoints from Electronic Health Record Data: Comparison of RECIST, Radiology-Anchored, and Clinician-Anchored Approaches for Abstracting Real-World Progression in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.

Griffith S, Tucker M, Bowser B, Calkins G, Chang C, Guardino E Adv Ther. 2019; 36(8):2122-2136.

PMID: 31140124 PMC: 6822856. DOI: 10.1007/s12325-019-00970-1.


References
1.
Fine B, Amler L . Predictive biomarkers in the development of oncology drugs: a therapeutic industry perspective. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2009; 85(5):535-8. DOI: 10.1038/clpt.2009.9. View

2.
de Bono J, Ashworth A . Translating cancer research into targeted therapeutics. Nature. 2010; 467(7315):543-9. DOI: 10.1038/nature09339. View

3.
Lou K, de Rond M . The 'not invented here' myth. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2006; 5(6):451-2. DOI: 10.1038/nrd2063. View

4.
Sridhara R, Johnson J, Justice R, Keegan P, Chakravarty A, Pazdur R . Review of oncology and hematology drug product approvals at the US Food and Drug Administration between July 2005 and December 2007. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010; 102(4):230-43. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djp515. View

5.
Thall P . A review of phase 2-3 clinical trial designs. Lifetime Data Anal. 2007; 14(1):37-53. DOI: 10.1007/s10985-007-9049-x. View