» Articles » PMID: 23254800

Spinal Robotics: Current Applications and Future Perspectives

Overview
Journal Neurosurgery
Specialty Neurosurgery
Date 2012 Dec 21
PMID 23254800
Citations 105
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Even though robotic technology holds great potential for performing spinal surgery and advancing neurosurgical techniques, it is of utmost importance to establish its practicality and to demonstrate better clinical outcomes compared with traditional techniques, especially in the current cost-effective era. Several systems have proved to be safe and reliable in the execution of tasks on a routine basis, are commercially available, and are used for specific indications in spine surgery. However, workflow, usability, interdisciplinary setups, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness have to be proven prospectively. This article includes a short description of robotic structures and workflow, followed by preliminary results of a randomized prospective study comparing conventional free-hand techniques with routine spine navigation and robotic-assisted procedures. Additionally, we present cases performed with a spinal robotic device, assessing not only the accuracy of the robotic-assisted procedure but also other factors (eg, minimal invasiveness, radiation dosage, and learning curves). Currently, the use of robotics in spinal surgery greatly enhances the application of minimally invasive procedures by increasing accuracy and reducing radiation exposure for patients and surgeons compared with standard procedures. Second-generation hardware and software upgrades of existing devices will enhance workflow and intraoperative setup. As more studies are published in this field, robot-assisted therapies will gain wider acceptance in the near future.

Citing Articles

Scoping review of robotics technology in spinal surgery with highlights of the Annual Seattle Science Foundation Course.

Dietz N, Alkin V, Lieberman I, Manista A, Kim T, Johnson J Ann Transl Med. 2025; 12(6):118.

PMID: 39817249 PMC: 11729805. DOI: 10.21037/atm-24-100.


Evolving Paradigms in Spinal Surgery: A Systematic Review of the Learning Curves in Minimally Invasive Spine Techniques.

Wu K, Yun Z, Suvithayasiri S, Liang Y, Setiawan D, Kotheeranurak V Neurospine. 2025; 21(4):1251-1275.

PMID: 39765270 PMC: 11744536. DOI: 10.14245/ns.2448838.419.


Complications in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery in the Last 10 Years: A Narrative Review.

Boadi B, Ikwuegbuenyi C, Inzerillo S, Dykhouse G, Bratescu R, Omer M Neurospine. 2024; 21(3):770-803.

PMID: 39363458 PMC: 11456948. DOI: 10.14245/ns.2448652.326.


Top 100 Most Cited Articles on Intraoperative Image-Guided Navigation in Spine Surgery.

Gonzalez-Gonzalez F, Aguilar-Chavez F, Martinez-Loya C, Marin-Castaneda L, Arellanes-Chavez C, Lee A Cureus. 2024; 16(8):e67950.

PMID: 39328685 PMC: 11426548. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.67950.


Minimally invasive robot-assisted direct pars repair: illustrative cases.

Stewart J, Zhao D, Pivazyan G, Gensler R, Voyadzis J J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 2024; 8(11).

PMID: 39250836 PMC: 11404107. DOI: 10.3171/CASE2415.