» Articles » PMID: 23248759

The Analysis of Image Feature Robustness Using Cometcloud

Overview
Journal J Pathol Inform
Date 2012 Dec 19
PMID 23248759
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The robustness of image features is a very important consideration in quantitative image analysis. The objective of this paper is to investigate the robustness of a range of image texture features using hematoxylin stained breast tissue microarray slides which are assessed while simulating different imaging challenges including out of focus, changes in magnification and variations in illumination, noise, compression, distortion, and rotation. We employed five texture analysis methods and tested them while introducing all of the challenges listed above. The texture features that were evaluated include co-occurrence matrix, center-symmetric auto-correlation, texture feature coding method, local binary pattern, and texton. Due to the independence of each transformation and texture descriptor, a network structured combination was proposed and deployed on the Rutgers private cloud. The experiments utilized 20 randomly selected tissue microarray cores. All the combinations of the image transformations and deformations are calculated, and the whole feature extraction procedure was completed in 70 minutes using a cloud equipped with 20 nodes. Center-symmetric auto-correlation outperforms all the other four texture descriptors but also requires the longest computational time. It is roughly 10 times slower than local binary pattern and texton. From a speed perspective, both the local binary pattern and texton features provided excellent performance for classification and content-based image retrieval.

Citing Articles

An Expandable Informatics Framework for Enhancing Central Cancer Registries with Digital Pathology Specimens, Computational Imaging Tools, and Advanced Mining Capabilities.

Foran D, Durbin E, Chen W, Sadimin E, Sharma A, Banerjee I J Pathol Inform. 2022; 13:5.

PMID: 35136672 PMC: 8794027. DOI: 10.4103/jpi.jpi_31_21.


An Assessment of Imaging Informatics for Precision Medicine in Cancer.

Chennubhotla C, Clarke L, Fedorov A, Foran D, Harris G, Helton E Yearb Med Inform. 2017; 26(1):110-119.

PMID: 29063549 PMC: 6250996. DOI: 10.15265/IY-2017-041.


Scalable analysis of Big pathology image data cohorts using efficient methods and high-performance computing strategies.

Kurc T, Qi X, Wang D, Wang F, Teodoro G, Cooper L BMC Bioinformatics. 2015; 16:399.

PMID: 26627175 PMC: 4667532. DOI: 10.1186/s12859-015-0831-6.


A scoping review of cloud computing in healthcare.

Griebel L, Prokosch H, Kopcke F, Toddenroth D, Christoph J, Leb I BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2015; 15:17.

PMID: 25888747 PMC: 4372226. DOI: 10.1186/s12911-015-0145-7.

References
1.
Diamond J, Anderson N, Bartels P, Montironi R, Hamilton P . The use of morphological characteristics and texture analysis in the identification of tissue composition in prostatic neoplasia. Hum Pathol. 2004; 35(9):1121-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2004.05.010. View

2.
Horng M, Sun Y, Lin X . Texture feature coding method for classification of liver sonography. Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2001; 26(1):33-42. DOI: 10.1016/s0895-6111(01)00029-5. View

3.
Schiffmann D, Dikovskaya D, Appleton P, Newton I, Creager D, Allan C . Open microscopy environment and findspots: integrating image informatics with quantitative multidimensional image analysis. Biotechniques. 2006; 41(2):199-208. DOI: 10.2144/000112224. View

4.
Rueckert D, Sonoda L, Hayes C, Hill D, Leach M, Hawkes D . Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1999; 18(8):712-21. DOI: 10.1109/42.796284. View

5.
Swedlow J, Goldberg I, Brauner E, Sorger P . Informatics and quantitative analysis in biological imaging. Science. 2003; 300(5616):100-2. PMC: 3522889. DOI: 10.1126/science.1082602. View