» Articles » PMID: 23247807

Differentiation of Adenomyomatosis of the Gallbladder from Early-stage, Wall-thickening-type Gallbladder Cancer Using High-resolution Ultrasound

Overview
Journal Eur Radiol
Specialty Radiology
Date 2012 Dec 19
PMID 23247807
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic performance of transabdominal high-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) for differentiation of adenomyomatosis from early-stage, wall-thickening-type gallbladder (GB) cancer.

Methods: HRUS was defined as the addition of high megahertz imaging to conventional low megahertz imaging with use of state-of-the-art imaging technology. HRUS findings were retrospectively compared in 45 patients with adenomyomatosis and 28 patients with stage T1/T2 wall-thickening-type GB cancer. For evaluating HRUS performance in the differential diagnosis of adenomyomatosis from GB cancer, receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used with a five-point confidence scale independently scored by three blinded radiologists who also analysed morphological abnormalities.

Results: The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (A (z)) values of HRUS in the diagnosis of adenomyomatosis were 0.948, 0.915 and 0.917 for reviewers 1, 2 and 3. Symmetrical wall thickening, intramural cystic spaces, intramural echogenic foci and twinkling artefacts were significantly associated with adenomyomatosis (P < 0.05), whereas irregular thickening of the outer wall, focal innermost hyperechoic layer (IHL) discontinuity, IHL irregularity, IHL thickening greater than 1 mm, loss of multilayer pattern in the GB wall, and intralesional vascularity were significantly associated with cancer (P < 0.05). The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of intramural cystic spaces/echogenic foci for the diagnosis of adenomyomatosis were 80.0 %, 85.7 % and 82.2 %.

Conclusions: This study showed that HRUS can be helpful for distinguishing adenomyomatosis from early-stage, wall-thickening-type GB cancer.

Citing Articles

Interpretation, Reporting, Imaging-Based Workups, and Surveillance of Incidentally Detected Gallbladder Polyps and Gallbladder Wall Thickening: 2025 Recommendations From the Korean Society of Abdominal Radiology.

Chang W, Lee S, Kim Y, Park J, Jeon S, Lee J Korean J Radiol. 2025; 26(2):102-134.

PMID: 39898393 PMC: 11794292. DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2024.0914.


Advanced ultrasound diagnosis of extrahepatic bile duct lesions.

Okaniwa S J Med Ultrason (2001). 2024; 52(1):69-83.

PMID: 39432029 PMC: 11799096. DOI: 10.1007/s10396-024-01491-3.


Ultrasound of the gallbladder: not the same bag of tricks.

Fung C, Spychka R, Noorelahi R, Vijay K, Fetzer D Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; 50(2):720-733.

PMID: 39207516 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04530-2.


Agreement of Gallbladder Reporting and Data System for Gallbladder Wall Thickening at Ultrasonography: A Multireader Validation Study.

Soundararajan R, Subramanian P, Gupta P, Rana P, Chhabra M, Singh S J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2024; 14(4):101393.

PMID: 38550799 PMC: 10966770. DOI: 10.1016/j.jceh.2024.101393.


Value of high frame rate contrast enhanced ultrasound in gallbladder wall thickening in non-acute setting.

Zhu L, Li N, Zhu Y, Han P, Jiang B, Li M Cancer Imaging. 2024; 24(1):7.

PMID: 38191513 PMC: 10775603. DOI: 10.1186/s40644-023-00651-x.


References
1.
Raghavendra B, Subramanyam B, Balthazar E, Horii S, Megibow A, Hilton S . Sonography of adenomyomatosis of the gallbladder: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1983; 146(3):747-52. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.146.3.6402802. View

2.
Stunell H, Buckley O, Geoghegan T, OBrien J, Ward E, Torreggiani W . Imaging of adenomyomatosis of the gall bladder. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2008; 52(2):109-17. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1673.2008.01926.x. View

3.
Mizuguchi M, Kudo S, Fukahori T, Matsuo Y, Miyazaki K, Tokunaga O . Endoscopic ultrasonography for demonstrating loss of multiple-layer pattern of the thickened gallbladder wall in the preoperative diagnosis of gallbladder cancer. Eur Radiol. 1997; 7(8):1323-7. DOI: 10.1007/s003300050296. View

4.
Yen C, Jeng C, Yang S . The benefits of comparing conventional sonography, real-time spatial compound sonography, tissue harmonic sonography, and tissue harmonic compound sonography of hepatic lesions. Clin Imaging. 2008; 32(1):11-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2007.07.002. View

5.
Jang J, Kim S, Lee S, Hwang D, Kim E, Lee J . Differential diagnostic and staging accuracies of high resolution ultrasonography, endoscopic ultrasonography, and multidetector computed tomography for gallbladder polypoid lesions and gallbladder cancer. Ann Surg. 2009; 250(6):943-9. DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b5d5fc. View