Software for the Automatic Correction of Recorded Eye Fixation Locations in Reading Experiments
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Because the recorded location of an eyetracking fixation is not a perfect measure of the actual fixated location, the recorded fixation locations must be adjusted before analysis. Fixations are typically corrected manually. Making such changes, however, is time-consuming and necessarily involves a subjective component. The goal of this article is to introduce software to automate parts of the correction process. The initial focus is on the correction of vertical locations and the removal of outliers and ambiguous fixations in reading experiments. The basic idea behind the algorithm is to use linear regression to assign each fixation to a text line and to identify outliers. The freely available software is implemented as a function, , written in R.
Al Madi N, Torra B, Li Y, Tariq N Behav Res Methods. 2025; 57(2):72.
PMID: 39856463 PMC: 11762023. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-025-02597-3.
The fundamentals of eye tracking part 4: Tools for conducting an eye tracking study.
Niehorster D, Nystrom M, Hessels R, Andersson R, Benjamins J, Hansen D Behav Res Methods. 2025; 57(1):46.
PMID: 39762687 PMC: 11703944. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-024-02529-7.
Advancing Dynamic-Time Warp Techniques for Correcting Eye Tracking Data in Reading Source Code.
Al Madi N J Eye Mov Res. 2024; 17(1).
PMID: 38708039 PMC: 11067821. DOI: 10.16910/jemr.17.1.4.
Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline.
Holmqvist K, Orbom S, Hooge I, Niehorster D, Alexander R, Andersson R Behav Res Methods. 2022; 55(1):364-416.
PMID: 35384605 PMC: 9535040. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-021-01762-8.
Algorithms for the automated correction of vertical drift in eye-tracking data.
Carr J, Pescuma V, Furlan M, Ktori M, Crepaldi D Behav Res Methods. 2021; 54(1):287-310.
PMID: 34159510 PMC: 8863743. DOI: 10.3758/s13428-021-01554-0.