» Articles » PMID: 23235707

Do First-time Breeding Females Imprint on Their Own Eggs?

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2012 Dec 14
PMID 23235707
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The egg-recognition processes underlying egg rejection are assumed to be based on an imprinting-like process (a female learning the aspect of her own eggs during her first breeding attempt). The imprinting-like process and the misimprinting costs have been the objective of many theoretical models and frequently have a leading role in papers published on brood parasitism; however, an experiment has never been undertaken to test the existence of this imprinting-like process by manipulating egg appearance in first-time breeding females. Here, we present the first such experimental study using the house sparrow (Passer domesticus), which is a conspecific brood parasite and which has a good ability to reject conspecific eggs, as a model species. We found that contrary to what the hypothesis predicts first-time breeding females did not reject their own eggs in their second breeding attempt. This lack of response against unmanipulated eggs could indicate that females have an innate preference for their own eggs. However, in a second experimental group in which first-time breeding females were allowed to learn the aspect of their (unmanipulated) own eggs, none ejected manipulated eggs during their second clutch either--a finding that does not support the idea of recognition templates being inherited, but instead suggests that recognition templates could be acquired again at each new breeding attempt. Our results demonstrate that it is likely that egg discrimination is not influenced by egg appearance in the first breeding attempt.

Citing Articles

Cuckoo Hosts Fine-Tune Their Egg Rejection After Experiencing a Parasitism Event.

Li B, Wang L, Liu J, Liang W Ecol Evol. 2025; 15(1):e70825.

PMID: 39781260 PMC: 11707265. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.70825.


Breeding stages affect egg recognition in azure-winged magpies (Cyanopica cyanus).

Liu J, Zhou F, Yan H, Liang W Anim Cogn. 2024; 27(1):71.

PMID: 39475969 PMC: 11525317. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-024-01915-0.


Host learning selects for the coevolution of greater egg mimicry and narrower antiparasitic egg-rejection thresholds.

Xu K, Servedio M, Winnicki S, Moskat C, Hoover J, Turner A Evol Lett. 2023; 7(6):413-421.

PMID: 38045722 PMC: 10693006. DOI: 10.1093/evlett/qrad041.


Signal detection and optimal acceptance thresholds in avian brood parasite-host systems: implications for egg rejection.

Ruiz-Raya F, Soler M Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020; 375(1802):20190477.

PMID: 32420851 PMC: 7331010. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0477.


A long-term experimental study demonstrates the costs of begging that were not found over the short term.

Soler M, Ruiz-Raya F, Carra L, Medina-Molina E, Ibanez-Alamo J, Martin-Galvez D PLoS One. 2014; 9(11):e111929.

PMID: 25372280 PMC: 4221185. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0111929.


References
1.
Marchetti . Egg rejection in a passerine bird: size does matter. Anim Behav. 2000; 59(4):877-883. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1388. View

2.
Soler J, Martinez J, Soler M, Moller A . GENETIC AND GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION IN REJECTION BEHAVIOR OF CUCKOO EGGS BY EUROPEAN MAGPIE POPULATIONS: AN EXPERIMENTAL TEST OF REJECTER-GENE FLOW. Evolution. 2017; 53(3):947-956. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1999.tb05388.x. View

3.
Soler M, Soler J, Martinez J, M Ller A . MAGPIE HOST MANIPULATION BY GREAT SPOTTED CUCKOOS: EVIDENCE FOR AN AVIAN MAFIA?. Evolution. 2017; 49(4):770-775. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1995.tb02312.x. View

4.
Rodriguez-Girones M, Lotem A . How to Detect a Cuckoo Egg: A Signal-Detection Theory Model for Recognition and Learning. Am Nat. 2018; 153(6):633-648. DOI: 10.1086/303198. View

5.
Moskat C, Hauber M . Conflict between egg recognition and egg rejection decisions in common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus) hosts. Anim Cogn. 2007; 10(4):377-86. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-007-0071-x. View