» Articles » PMID: 23226838

Is Attention Shared Between the Ears?

Overview
Journal Cogn Psychol
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Psychology
Date 2012 Dec 11
PMID 23226838
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study tests the locus of attention during selective listening for speech-like stimuli. Can processing be differentially allocated to the two ears? Two conditions were used. The simultaneous condition involved one of four randomly chosen stop-consonants being presented to one of the ears chosen at random. The sequential condition involved two intervals; in the first S listened to the right ear; in the second S listened to the left ear. One of the four consonants was presented to an attended ear during one of these intervals. Experiment I used no distracting stimuli. Experiment II utilized a distracting consonant not confusable with any of the four target consonants. This distractor was always presented to any ear not containing a target. In both experiments, simultaneous and sequential performance were essentially identical, despite the need for attention sharing between the two ears during the simultaneous condition. We conclude that selective attention does not occur during perceptual processing of speech sounds presented to the two ears. We suggest that attentive effects arise in short-term memory following processing.

Citing Articles

Neural correlates of a load-dependent decline in visual working memory.

Li Y, Noguchi Y Cereb Cortex Commun. 2022; 3(2):tgac015.

PMID: 35495900 PMC: 9050239. DOI: 10.1093/texcom/tgac015.


On the identification of place and voicing features in synthetic stop consonants.

Sawusch J, Pisoni D J Phon. 2014; 2(3):181-194.

PMID: 25152551 PMC: 4139934.


Short-term memory as a response preparation state.

Klapp S Mem Cognit. 2011; 4(6):721-9.

PMID: 21287003 DOI: 10.3758/BF03213240.


Switching or sharing in dual-task line-length discrimination?.

Miller J, Bonnel A Percept Psychophys. 1994; 56(4):431-46.

PMID: 7984399 DOI: 10.3758/bf03206735.


Uncertain-frequency detection: cuing and condition of observation.

Johnson D, Hafter E Percept Psychophys. 1980; 28(2):143-9.

PMID: 7432988 DOI: 10.3758/bf03204340.


References
1.
Broadbent D, Gregory M . DIVISION OF ATTENTION AND THE DECISION THEORY OF SIGNAL DETECTION. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1963; 158:222-31. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.1963.0044. View

2.
Broadbent D . Listening to one of two synchronous messages. J Exp Psychol. 1952; 44(1):51-5. DOI: 10.1037/h0056491. View

3.
TREISMAN A . Strategies and models of selective attention. Psychol Rev. 1969; 76(3):282-99. DOI: 10.1037/h0027242. View

4.
TREISMAN A, RILEY J . Is selective attention selective perception or selective response? A further test. J Exp Psychol. 1969; 79(1):27-34. DOI: 10.1037/h0026890. View

5.
Treisman A, Geffen G . Selective attention: perception or response?. Q J Exp Psychol. 1967; 19(1):1-17. DOI: 10.1080/14640746708400062. View