» Articles » PMID: 23224323

A Prospective Study of Socioeconomic Status, Prostate Cancer Screening and Incidence Among Men at High Risk for Prostate Cancer

Overview
Specialties Oncology
Public Health
Date 2012 Dec 11
PMID 23224323
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Higher socioeconomic status (SES) men are at higher risk of prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis, an association commonly interpreted as a function of higher rates of prostate screening among higher SES men. However, the extent to which screening explains this association has not been well quantified.

Methods: Within a Detroit area cohort of 6,692 men followed up after a benign prostate procedure, a case-control study was conducted of 494 PCa cases and controls matched on age, race, duration of follow-up, and date of initial benign finding; 2000 Census data were used in a principal component analysis to derive a single factor, labeled the neighborhood SES index (NSESI), representing zip code-level SES.

Results: Among cases, higher SES was associated with a younger age at initial biopsy: -1.48 years (95 % CI, -2.32, -0.64) per unit NSESI. After adjustment for confounders and duration of follow-up, higher SES was associated with more PSA tests and DRE during follow-up; 9 % (95 % CI, 2, 16) and 8 % (95 % CI, 1, 15) more respectively, per unit NSESI. Higher SES was associated with a higher risk of PCa diagnosis during follow-up, multivariable adjusted OR = 1.26 per unit increase in NSESI (95 % CI, 1.04, 1.49). Further adjustment for screening frequency somewhat reduced the association between SES and PCa risk (OR = 1.19 per unit NSESI, 95 % CI, 0.98, 1.44).

Conclusions: Differences in screening frequency only partially explained the association between higher zip code SES and PCa risk; other health care-related factors should also be considered as explanatory factors.

Citing Articles

Causal associations between socioeconomic status and prostate cancer using two-sample Mendelian randomization study.

Wang Z, Wang C, Gou X, Pei L, Qiao X Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):4639.

PMID: 39920261 PMC: 11806085. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-88300-0.


Screening for prostate cancer: evidence, ongoing trials, policies and knowledge gaps.

Bratt O, Auvinen A, Arnsrud Godtman R, Hellstrom M, Hugosson J, Lilja H BMJ Oncol. 2025; 2(1):e000039.

PMID: 39886507 PMC: 11203092. DOI: 10.1136/bmjonc-2023-000039.


Future sick leave, disability pension, and unemployment among patients with cancer after returning to work: Swedish register-based matched prospective cohort study.

Hiyoshi A, Alexanderson K, Tinghog P, Cao Y, Fall K, Montgomery S Cancer. 2024; 131(1):e35580.

PMID: 39377486 PMC: 11694158. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35580.


Association of neighborhood gentrification with prostate cancer and immune markers in African American and European American men.

Pichardo C, Ezeani A, Pichardo M, Agurs-Collins T, Powell-Wiley T, Ryan B Cancer Med. 2023; 13(1):e6828.

PMID: 38151903 PMC: 10807554. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6828.


Reduced Racial Disparity as a Result of Survival Improvement in Prostate Cancer.

Zhang B, Li J, Tang M, Cheng C Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(15).

PMID: 37568792 PMC: 10417437. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153977.


References
1.
Gornick M, Eggers P, Riley G . Associations of race, education, and patterns of preventive service use with stage of cancer at time of diagnosis. Health Serv Res. 2004; 39(5):1403-27. PMC: 1361076. DOI: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00296.x. View

2.
Guagliardo M, Ronzio C, Cheung I, Chacko E, Joseph J . Physician accessibility: an urban case study of pediatric providers. Health Place. 2004; 10(3):273-83. DOI: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2003.01.001. View

3.
Seo H, Lee N . Predictors of PSA Screening Among Men Over 40 Years of Age Who Had Ever Heard about PSA. Korean J Urol. 2010; 51(6):391-7. PMC: 2890055. DOI: 10.4111/kju.2010.51.6.391. View

4.
Major J, Oliver M, Doubeni C, Hollenbeck A, Graubard B, Sinha R . Socioeconomic status, healthcare density, and risk of prostate cancer among African American and Caucasian men in a large prospective study. Cancer Causes Control. 2012; 23(7):1185-91. PMC: 3405544. DOI: 10.1007/s10552-012-9988-8. View

5.
Byers T, Wolf H, Bauer K, Bolick-Aldrich S, Chen V, Finch J . The impact of socioeconomic status on survival after cancer in the United States : findings from the National Program of Cancer Registries Patterns of Care Study. Cancer. 2008; 113(3):582-91. DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23567. View