» Articles » PMID: 23224141

Intervention Thresholds for Denosumab in the UK Using a FRAX®-based Cost-effectiveness Analysis

Overview
Journal Osteoporos Int
Date 2012 Dec 11
PMID 23224141
Citations 21
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Unlabelled: The objective was to undertake a health economic analysis of denosumab for the treatment of osteoporosis in women from the UK, using the FRAX® tool. Denosumab was cost-effective in women with a risk of major osteoporotic fracture meeting or exceeding approximately 20% who are unable to take, comply with or tolerate generic alendronate.

Introduction: Denosumab is a novel biologic agent developed for the treatment of osteoporosis, which has been shown to reduce the risk of fractures in a phase-III trial. The objective of the present study was to undertake a health economic analysis of denosumab in women from the UK. Ten-year probabilities of a major osteoporotic fracture at which denosumab is a cost-effective alternative to no treatment, generic alendronate, risedronate and strontium ranelate were estimated.

Methods: A previously published Markov model was adapted to incorporate fracture and mortality risk assessments based on absolute fracture probability, as estimated by FRAX®. The model included treatment persistence and residual effect after discontinuation.

Results: At a willingness-to-pay (WTP) of £30,000 per quality-adjusted life year and a 10-year fracture probability equivalent to a woman with a prior fragility fracture, denosumab was cost-effective compared to no treatment from the age of 70 years. At the same WTP, denosumab was-irrespective of age-cost-effective compared to no treatment at a major osteoporotic fracture probability of approximately 20%. Denosumab was estimated to cost-effectively replace strontium, risedronate and generic alendronate at 10-year probabilities exceeding 11, 19 and 32%, respectively.

Conclusion: FRAX® facilitates the estimation of cost-effectiveness-based intervention thresholds applicable to patients with different combinations of clinical risk factors, which more closely matches the situation in clinical practice. Denosumab is cost-effective in patients with major osteoporotic fracture probabilities meeting or exceeding approximately 20% who are unable to take, comply with or tolerate generic alendronate.

Citing Articles

Executive summary: Italian guidelines for diagnosis, risk stratification, and care continuity of fragility fractures 2021.

Corrao G, Biffi A, Porcu G, Ronco R, Adami G, Alvaro R Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2023; 14:1137671.

PMID: 37143730 PMC: 10151776. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2023.1137671.


Integrating economic considerations into cutpoint selection may help align clinical decision support toward value-based healthcare.

Parsons R, Blythe R, Cramb S, McPhail S J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2023; 30(6):1103-1113.

PMID: 36970849 PMC: 10198528. DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocad042.


Cost-Effectiveness of Denosumab for the Treatment of Postmenopausal Osteoporosis in South Korea.

Kang J, Choi L, Johnson B, Yang H J Bone Metab. 2022; 29(2):83-92.

PMID: 35718925 PMC: 9208907. DOI: 10.11005/jbm.2022.29.2.83.


Acute kidney injury after hip fracture surgery in patients over 80 years of age.

Agar A, Gulabi D, Sahin A, Gunes O, Hancerli C, Kilic B Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2021; 142(9):2245-2252.

PMID: 34056678 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-03969-y.


Systematic evidence of health economic evaluation of drugs for postmenopausal osteoporosis: A quality appraisal.

Azharuddin M, Adil M, Khan R, Ghosh P, Kapur P, Sharma M Osteoporos Sarcopenia. 2020; 6(2):39-52.

PMID: 32715093 PMC: 7374246. DOI: 10.1016/j.afos.2020.05.006.


References
1.
van Staa T, Leufkens H, Abenhaim L, Zhang B, Cooper C . Oral corticosteroids and fracture risk: relationship to daily and cumulative doses. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2001; 39(12):1383-9. DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/39.12.1383. View

2.
Kanis J, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey E . Bazedoxifene reduces vertebral and clinical fractures in postmenopausal women at high risk assessed with FRAX. Bone. 2009; 44(6):1049-54. DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2009.02.014. View

3.
Kurth A, Pfeilschifter J . [Diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and osteoporosis in men. German Guidelines Update 2006]. Orthopade. 2007; 36(7):683-90. DOI: 10.1007/s00132-007-1106-3. View

4.
. Screening for osteoporosis: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2011; 154(5):356-64. DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-5-201103010-00307. View

5.
Cummings S, San Martin J, McClung M, Siris E, Eastell R, Reid I . Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(8):756-65. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0809493. View