» Articles » PMID: 23224042

Computer-assisted Flapless Implant Placement Reduces the Incidence of Surgery-related Bacteremia

Overview
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2012 Dec 11
PMID 23224042
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Bacteremia--the access of bacterium to the bloodstream--may yield life-threatening complications. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence, duration, and type of bacterium leading to bacteremia with relation to conventional and computer-assisted flapless implant surgery.

Material And Methods: A total of 377 implants were placed in 68 edentulous jaws using the conventional (conventional group) or a computer-assisted stereolithographic (SLA) template-guided surgery technique (flapless group). Bacteremia was monitored from pre- and postoperative blood samples.

Results: The duration of the surgical intervention was significantly shorter in the flapless group (p = 0.3510). Baseline samples were sterile. Following the 15th minute after the placement of the last implant, bacteria were present in 62 and 12 % of the patients in the conventional and flapless groups, respectively (p < 0.0001; relative risk: 3.05). The differences in the incidence of the bacteremia detected at the baseline and 15 min after the last implant placement were statistically significant in the conventional group (p = 0.0001). However, no such statistical significance was present in the flapless group. Staphylocccus epidermidis, Bifidobacterium spp., Streptococcus viridans, Corynebacterium spp., and Streptococcus sanguinis were the isolated bacterium.

Conclusions: Irrespective of the utilized technique, bacteremia may occur upon the placement of four to eight implants to an edentulous jaw. The probability of bacteremia for the patients operated with the conventional technique is, however, 3.05 greater than those operated with the flapless technique.

Clinical Relevance: Flapless implant placement reduces the incidence of surgery-related bacteremia and, therefore, may be beneficial to patients at risk.

Citing Articles

Effects of disinfection and sterilization on the dimensional changes and mechanical properties of 3D printed surgical guides for implant therapy - pilot study.

Torok G, Gombocz P, Bognar E, Nagy P, Dinya E, Kispelyi B BMC Oral Health. 2020; 20(1):19.

PMID: 31973705 PMC: 6979289. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-020-1005-0.


Complete-arch fixed reconstruction by means of guided surgery and immediate loading: a retrospective clinical study on 12 patients with 1 year of follow-up.

Lerner H, Hauschild U, Sader R, Ghanaati S BMC Oral Health. 2020; 20(1):15.

PMID: 31948414 PMC: 6966809. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-019-0941-z.

References
1.
Monsenego P . Presence of microorganisms on the fitting denture complete surface: study 'in vivo'. J Oral Rehabil. 2000; 27(8):708-13. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2842.2000.00564.x. View

2.
Hogg G, McKenna J, Ong G . Rapid detection of methicillin-susceptible and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus directly from positive BacT/Alert blood culture bottles using real-time polymerase chain reaction: evaluation and comparison of 4 DNA extraction methods. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008; 61(4):446-52. DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2008.03.012. View

3.
Quirynen M, Van Assche N . Microbial changes after full-mouth tooth extraction, followed by 2-stage implant placement. J Clin Periodontol. 2011; 38(6):581-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2011.01728.x. View

4.
Shanson D . New British and American guidelines for the antibiotic prophylaxis of infective endocarditis: do the changes make sense? A critical review. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2008; 21(2):191-9. DOI: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e3282f94765. View

5.
Heimdahl A, Hall G, Hedberg M, Sandberg H, Soder P, Tuner K . Detection and quantitation by lysis-filtration of bacteremia after different oral surgical procedures. J Clin Microbiol. 1990; 28(10):2205-9. PMC: 268148. DOI: 10.1128/jcm.28.10.2205-2209.1990. View