» Articles » PMID: 23222648

Histomorphometric and Radiographical Changes After Lumbar Implantation of the PEEK Nonfusion Interspinous Device in the BB.4S Rat Model

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2012 Dec 11
PMID 23222648
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: An experimental animal study.

Objective: To investigate histomorphometric and radiographical changes in the BB.4S rat model after PEEK (polyetheretherketone) nonfusion interspinous device implantation.

Summary Of Background Data: Clinical effectiveness of the PEEK nonfusion spine implant Wallis (Abbott, Bordeaux, France; now Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) is well documented. However, there is a lack of evidence on the long-term effects of this implant on bone, in particular its influence on structural changes of bone elements of the lumbar spine.

Methods: Twenty-four male BB.4S rats aged 11 weeks underwent surgery for implantation of a PEEK nonfusion interspinous device or for a sham procedure in 3 groups of 8 animals each: (1) implantation at level L4-L5; (2) implantation at level L5-L6; and (3) sham surgery. Eleven weeks postoperatively osteolyses at the implant-bone interface were measured via radiograph, bone mineral density of vertebral bodies was analyzed using osteodensitometry, and bone mineral content as well as resorption of the spinous processes were examined by histomorphometry. RESULTS.: Resorption of the spinous processes at the site of the interspinous implant was found in all treated segments. There was no significant difference in either bone density of vertebral bodies or histomorphometric structure of the spinous processes between adjacent vertebral bodies, between treated and untreated segments and between groups.

Conclusion: These findings indicate that resorption of spinous processes because of a result of implant loosening, inhibit the targeted load redistribution through the PEEK nonfusion interspinous device in the lumbar spinal segment of the rat. This leads to reduced long-term stability of the implant in the animal model. These results suggest that PEEK nonfusion interspinous devices like the Wallis implants may have time-limited effects and should only be used for specified indications.

Citing Articles

Epidural pressure measurement using a fiber-optic sensor (proof-of-principle in vivo animal trial).

Barz S, Friedemann M, Voigt S, Melloh M, Barz T Animal Model Exp Med. 2024; 7(5):769-776.

PMID: 38981680 PMC: 11528391. DOI: 10.1002/ame2.12469.


Interspinous process stabilization with Rocker via unilateral approach versus X-Stop via bilateral approach for lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative study.

Huang W, Chang Z, Zhang J, Song R, Yu X BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015; 16:328.

PMID: 26522063 PMC: 4629402. DOI: 10.1186/s12891-015-0786-9.


Interspinous posterior devices: What is the real surgical indication?.

Landi A World J Clin Cases. 2014; 2(9):402-8.

PMID: 25232541 PMC: 4163760. DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v2.i9.402.


Safe clinical use of carbon nanotubes as innovative biomaterials.

Saito N, Haniu H, Usui Y, Aoki K, Hara K, Takanashi S Chem Rev. 2014; 114(11):6040-79.

PMID: 24720563 PMC: 4059771. DOI: 10.1021/cr400341h.