» Articles » PMID: 23216497

Projected Socioeconomic Disparities in the Prevalence of Obesity Among Australian Adults

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Public Health
Date 2012 Dec 11
PMID 23216497
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To project prevalence of normal weight, overweight and obesity by educational attainment, assuming a continuation of the observed individual weight change in the 5-year follow-up of the national population survey, the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle study (AusDiab; 2000-2005).

Methods: Age-specific transition probabilities between BMI categories, estimated using logistic regression, were entered into education-level-specific, incidence-based, multi-state life tables. Assuming a continuation of the weight change observed in AusDiab, these life tables estimate the prevalence of normal weight, overweight and obesity for Australian adults with low (secondary), medium (diploma) and high (degree) levels of education between 2005 and 2025.

Results: The prevalence of obesity among individuals with secondary level educational attainment is estimated to increase from 23% in 2000 to 44% in 2025. Among individuals with a degree qualification or higher, it will increase from 14% to 30%. If all current educational inequalities in weight change could be eliminated, the projected difference in the prevalence of obesity by 2025 between the highest and lowest educated categories would only be reduced by half (to a 6 percentage point difference from 14 percentage points).

Conclusion: We predict that almost half of Australian adults with low educational status will be obese by 2025. Current trends in obesity have the potential to drive an increase in the absolute difference in obesity prevalence between educational categories in future years.

Implications: Unless obesity prevention and management strategies focus specifically on narrowing social inequalities in obesity, inequalities in health are likely to widen.

Citing Articles

Equalising power imbalances or a trail of broken promises? A qualitative study on engaging people with diverse lived experience of marginalisation in food policymaking in Australia.

Venegas Hargous C, Kapeke K, Backholer K, Jeyapalan D, Nunez V, Browne J BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):613.

PMID: 39953486 PMC: 11827468. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21733-4.


How do gamified digital therapeutics work on obesity self-management?.

Zhu X, Gu S, Li J Metabol Open. 2024; 23:100314.

PMID: 39290343 PMC: 11406243. DOI: 10.1016/j.metop.2024.100314.


Trends in obesity by socioeconomic status among non-pregnant women aged 15-49 y: a cross-sectional, multi-dimensional equity analysis of demographic and health surveys in 11 sub-Saharan Africa countries, 1994-2015.

Wariri O, Alhassan J, Mark G, Adesiyan O, Hanson L Int Health. 2020; 13(5):436-445.

PMID: 33205197 PMC: 8417076. DOI: 10.1093/inthealth/ihaa093.


Understanding America: Unequal Economic Returns of Years of Schooling in Whites and Blacks.

Assari S World J Educ Res. 2020; 7(2):78-92.

PMID: 32582861 PMC: 7314384. DOI: 10.22158/wjer.v7n2p78.


Treats are a tool of the trade: an exploration of food treats among grandparents who provide informal childcare.

Pankhurst M, Mehta K, Matwiejczyk L, Moores C, Prichard I, Mortimer S Public Health Nutr. 2019; 22(14):2643-2652.

PMID: 31148540 PMC: 10260415. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980019000685.