» Articles » PMID: 23213324

Gel-based and Gel-free Quantitative Proteomics Approaches at a Glance

Overview
Date 2012 Dec 6
PMID 23213324
Citations 52
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Two-dimensional gel electrophoresis (2-DE) is widely applied and remains the method of choice in proteomics; however, pervasive 2-DE-related concerns undermine its prospects as a dominant separation technique in proteome research. Consequently, the state-of-the-art shotgun techniques are slowly taking over and utilising the rapid expansion and advancement of mass spectrometry (MS) to provide a new toolbox of gel-free quantitative techniques. When coupled to MS, the shotgun proteomic pipeline can fuel new routes in sensitive and high-throughput profiling of proteins, leading to a high accuracy in quantification. Although label-based approaches, either chemical or metabolic, gained popularity in quantitative proteomics because of the multiplexing capacity, these approaches are not without drawbacks. The burgeoning label-free methods are tag independent and suitable for all kinds of samples. The challenges in quantitative proteomics are more prominent in plants due to difficulties in protein extraction, some protein abundance in green tissue, and the absence of well-annotated and completed genome sequences. The goal of this perspective assay is to present the balance between the strengths and weaknesses of the available gel-based and -free methods and their application to plants. The latest trends in peptide fractionation amenable to MS analysis are as well discussed.

Citing Articles

Deciphering Cancer Complexity: Integrative Proteogenomics and Proteomics Approaches for Biomarker Discovery.

Rao R, Gulfishan M, Kim M, Kashyap M Methods Mol Biol. 2024; 2859:211-237.

PMID: 39436604 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-4152-1_12.


Proteomic Insights into Osteoporosis: Unraveling Diagnostic Markers of and Therapeutic Targets for the Metabolic Bone Disease.

Wang J, Xue M, Hu Y, Li J, Li Z, Wang Y Biomolecules. 2024; 14(5).

PMID: 38785961 PMC: 11118602. DOI: 10.3390/biom14050554.


Exploring the secretome of ATCC 13032.

Balasubramanian S, Kohler J, Jers C, Jensen P, Mijakovic I Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2024; 12:1348184.

PMID: 38415189 PMC: 10896948. DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2024.1348184.


The roles of plant proteases and protease inhibitors in drought response: a review.

Moloi S, Ngara R Front Plant Sci. 2023; 14:1165845.

PMID: 37143877 PMC: 10151539. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1165845.


Development and Optimization of Label-Free Quantitative Proteomics under Different Crossing Periods of Bottle Gourd.

Malik A, Mor V, Punia H, Duhan D, Tokas J, Bhuker A Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2023; 45(2):1349-1372.

PMID: 36826033 PMC: 9955185. DOI: 10.3390/cimb45020088.


References
1.
Park O . Proteomic studies in plants. J Biochem Mol Biol. 2004; 37(1):133-8. DOI: 10.5483/bmbrep.2004.37.1.133. View

2.
Gevaert K, Van Damme P, Ghesquiere B, Impens F, Martens L, Helsens K . A la carte proteomics with an emphasis on gel-free techniques. Proteomics. 2007; 7(16):2698-718. DOI: 10.1002/pmic.200700114. View

3.
Ow S, Salim M, Noirel J, Evans C, Rehman I, Wright P . iTRAQ underestimation in simple and complex mixtures: "the good, the bad and the ugly". J Proteome Res. 2009; 8(11):5347-55. DOI: 10.1021/pr900634c. View

4.
Huttlin E, Hegeman A, Harms A, Sussman M . Comparison of full versus partial metabolic labeling for quantitative proteomics analysis in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2007; 6(5):860-81. DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M600347-MCP200. View

5.
Sun Q, Hu C, Hu J, Li S, Zhu Y . Quantitative proteomic analysis of CMS-related changes in Honglian CMS rice anther. Protein J. 2009; 28(7-8):341-8. DOI: 10.1007/s10930-009-9199-7. View