» Articles » PMID: 23197596

Detection Rates of Precancerous and Cancerous Cervical Lesions Within One Screening Round of Primary Human Papillomavirus DNA Testing: Prospective Randomised Trial in Finland

Overview
Journal BMJ
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2012 Dec 1
PMID 23197596
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To compare the detection rates of precancerous and cancerous cervical lesions by human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing and by conventional cytology screening.

Design: Prospective randomised trial. Two cohorts were followed over one screening round of five years, screened initially by primary HPV DNA testing or by primary Pap test.

Setting: Population based programme for cervical cancer screening in Finland.

Participants: Women aged 25-65 years invited for screening in 2003-07 (101,678 in HPV arm; 101,747 in conventional cytology arm).

Intervention: Women were randomly allocated (1:1) to primary HPV DNA screening followed by cytology triage if they had positive results, or to primary cytology screening. Screening method was disclosed at the screening visit. Trial personnel involved were aware of all test results.

Main Outcome Measures: Cumulative detection rates of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN), adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS), and invasive cervical cancer before the second screening (after five years) or before 31 December 2008. Lesions detected at screening and during the five year interval were included.

Results: 1010 and 701 precancerous or cancerous lesions were detected during an average follow-up of 3.6 years in the HPV and cytology arms, respectively. Among invited women, the hazard ratio was 1.53 (95% confidence interval l.28 to 1.84) for CIN grade 1, 1.54 (1.33 to 1.78) for CIN 2, 1.32 (1.09 to 1.59) for CIN 3 or AIS, and 0.81 (0.48 to 1.37) for cervical cancer. In 25-34 year old participants, the cumulative hazard (or cumulative detection rate) was 0.0057 (0.0045 to 0.0072) for HPV screening versus 0.0046 (0.0035 to 0.0059) for conventional screening; corresponding data for women aged 35 years and older were 0.0022 (0.0019 to 0.0026) and 0.0017 (0.0014 to 0.0021), respectively.

Conclusions: Primary HPV DNA screening detects more cervical lesions than primary cytology within one screening round of five years. Even if the detection rate of CIN 3 or AIS increased in the HPV arm in both age groups, the absolute difference in cumulative rates in women aged 35 years or older was small. By carefully selecting age groups and screening intervals, HPV screening could increase the overall detection rate of cervical precancerous lesions only slightly. However, these findings should be interpreted in the context of the high level of opportunistic screening that occurs in Finland.

Trial Registration: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial ISRCTN23885553.

Citing Articles

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Carcinoma of the Cervix With Histopathological Correlation in a Tertiary Care Center: Emphasizing the Rise of Adenocarcinoma in the Indian Context.

Subbarayan S, R D, Dhanasingh P Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e71820.

PMID: 39559599 PMC: 11570783. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.71820.


Evidence of Decreased Long-term Risk of Cervical Precancer after Negative Primary HPV Screens Compared with Negative Cytology Screens in a Longitudinal Cohort Study.

Gottschlich A, Hong Q, Gondara L, Alam M, Cook D, Martin R Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024; 33(7):904-911.

PMID: 38773687 PMC: 11216858. DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-23-1587.


Divergent effects of switching from cytology to HPV-based screening in the Nordic countries.

Partanen V, Dillner J, Trope A, Agustsson A, Lonnberg S, Heinavaara S Eur J Public Health. 2024; 34(2):354-360.

PMID: 38261374 PMC: 10990554. DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad225.


Economic Evaluation of Mailed Home-Based Human Papillomavirus Self-sampling Kits for Cervical Cancer Screening.

Meenan R, Troja C, Buist D, Tiro J, Lin J, Anderson M JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(3):e234052.

PMID: 36947040 PMC: 10034577. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.4052.


High sensitivity and specificity rates of cobas® HPV test as a primary screening test for cervical intraepithelial lesions in a real-world setting.

Fleider L, de Los Angeles Tinnirello M, Gomez Cherey F, Garcia M, Cardinal L, Garcia Kamermann F PLoS One. 2023; 18(2):e0279728.

PMID: 36745662 PMC: 9901754. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0279728.


References
1.
Nieminen P, Kallio M, Hakama M . The effect of mass screening on incidence and mortality of squamous and adenocarcinoma of cervix uteri. Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 85(6):1017-21. DOI: 10.1016/0029-7844(95)00063-W. View

2.
Arbyn M, Raifu A, Weiderpass E, Bray F, Anttila A . Trends of cervical cancer mortality in the member states of the European Union. Eur J Cancer. 2009; 45(15):2640-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.07.018. View

3.
McCredie M, Sharples K, Paul C, Baranyai J, Medley G, Jones R . Natural history of cervical neoplasia and risk of invasive cancer in women with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2008; 9(5):425-34. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70103-7. View

4.
Bulkmans N, Berkhof J, Rozendaal L, van Kemenade F, Boeke A, Bulk S . Human papillomavirus DNA testing for the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 and cancer: 5-year follow-up of a randomised controlled implementation trial. Lancet. 2007; 370(9601):1764-72. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61450-0. View

5.
Sankaranarayanan R, Nene B, Shastri S, Jayant K, Muwonge R, Budukh A . HPV screening for cervical cancer in rural India. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(14):1385-94. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0808516. View