» Articles » PMID: 23195374

Accuracy of In-vitro Tooth Volumetric Measurements from Cone-beam Computed Tomography

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Dentistry
Date 2012 Dec 1
PMID 23195374
Citations 19
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: The aims of this study were to determine the accuracy of volumetric measurements of teeth in vitro by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and to analyze the factors affecting their volume measurements from the CBCT data.

Methods: We used a sample of CBCT-scanned (voxel sizes: 0.125, 0.20, 0.25, 0.30, and 0.40 mm) and laser-scanned crowns (n = 40) and roots (n = 32). The Tukey test was used to assess the differences between the CBCT-scan and the laser-scan volumes.

Results: There was a statistically significant difference between the laser-scan crown volume and each voxel size of CBCT-scan crown volume (P <0.05). CBCT-scan crown volumes at 0.30 and 0.40 mm were statistically significantly distinct from those at 0.125, 0.20, and 0.25 mm (P <0.05). There was a statistically significant difference between the laser-scan root volume and each voxel size of CBCT-scan root volume (P <0.05). The laser-scan root volume at 0.40 mm was statistically significantly distinct from the volumes at 0.125 and 0.20 mm (P <0.05). The in-vitro volume measurements from the CBCT scans were larger than those of the laser scans: from 21.73% to 43.92% in the crown halves, and from 18.27% to 41.58% in the root halves at the different voxel sizes.

Conclusions: With increasing voxel sizes during scanning, the volume measurements of teeth tended to be larger. The surface surrounding artifacts might lead to larger volumes.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of CBCT reconstructed tooth models at different thresholds and voxels and their accuracy in fusion with IOS data: an in vitro validation study.

Zhang Y, Liu Y, Liu T, Zhang J, Lin P, Liu D BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):1571.

PMID: 39736564 PMC: 11684253. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-05395-z.


Repeatability and effect of different voxel sizes on linear and volumetric tooth and pulp measurements using cone-beam computed tomography.

Ozdede M, Akay G, Karadag Atas O, Koc E, Yalcin O, Gungor K BMC Oral Health. 2024; 24(1):1472.

PMID: 39633298 PMC: 11619308. DOI: 10.1186/s12903-024-05259-6.


Effects of the cone-beam computed tomography protocol on the accuracy and image quality of root surface area measurements: An study.

Intarasuksanti C, Prapayasatok S, Kampan N, Sirabanchongkran S, Mahakkanukrauh P, Sastraruji T Imaging Sci Dent. 2024; 53(4):325-333.

PMID: 38174039 PMC: 10761297. DOI: 10.5624/isd.20230090.


Three-dimensional evaluation of a virtual setup considering the roots and alveolar bone in molar distalization cases.

Huh J, Liu J, Yu J, Choi Y, Ahn H, Chung C Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):14955.

PMID: 37696835 PMC: 10495328. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-41480-z.


3D reconstruction of lower anterior teeth from CBCT images: automatic segmentation with manual refinements.

Morell G, Chen K, Flores-Mir C Dental Press J Orthod. 2023; 28(3):e232249.

PMID: 37466507 PMC: 10353849. DOI: 10.1590/2177-6709.28.3.e232249.oar.