» Articles » PMID: 23194819

A Quantitative Meta-analysis and Review of Motor Learning in the Human Brain

Overview
Journal Neuroimage
Specialty Radiology
Date 2012 Dec 1
PMID 23194819
Citations 255
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Neuroimaging studies have improved our understanding of which brain structures are involved in motor learning. Despite this, questions remain regarding the areas that contribute consistently across paradigms with different task demands. For instance, sensorimotor tasks focus on learning novel movement kinematics and dynamics, while serial response time task (SRTT) variants focus on sequence learning. These differing task demands are likely to elicit quantifiably different patterns of neural activity on top of a potentially consistent core network. The current study identified consistent activations across 70 motor learning experiments using activation likelihood estimation (ALE) meta-analysis. A global analysis of all tasks revealed a bilateral cortical-subcortical network consistently underlying motor learning across tasks. Converging activations were revealed in the dorsal premotor cortex, supplementary motor cortex, primary motor cortex, primary somatosensory cortex, superior parietal lobule, thalamus, putamen and cerebellum. These activations were broadly consistent across task specific analyses that separated sensorimotor tasks and SRTT variants. Contrast analysis indicated that activity in the basal ganglia and cerebellum was significantly stronger for sensorimotor tasks, while activity in cortical structures and the thalamus was significantly stronger for SRTT variants. Additional conjunction analyses then indicated that the left dorsal premotor cortex was activated across all analyses considered, even when controlling for potential motor confounds. The highly consistent activation of the left dorsal premotor cortex suggests it is a critical node in the motor learning network.

Citing Articles

The Supplementary Motor Area as a Flexible Hub Mediating Behavioral and Neuroplastic Changes in Motor Sequence Learning: A TMS and TMS-EEG Study.

Chen J, Fan Y, Jia X, Fan F, Wang J, Zou Q Neurosci Bull. 2025; .

PMID: 40080252 DOI: 10.1007/s12264-025-01375-7.


Implicit Motor Learning Under Anodal or Cathodal tDCS During fMRI Induces Partially Distinct Network Responses.

Hamzei F, Ritter A, Gullmar D Eur J Neurosci. 2025; 61(5):e70053.

PMID: 40075554 PMC: 11903934. DOI: 10.1111/ejn.70053.


The Reciprocal Relationship Between Short- and Long-Term Motor Learning and Neurometabolites.

Hehl M, Van Malderen S, Blashchuk S, Sunaert S, Edden R, Swinnen S Hum Brain Mapp. 2025; 46(4):e70170.

PMID: 40035365 PMC: 11877351. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.70170.


Exploring the Impact of Declarative Learning on the Consolidation of Acquired Motor Skills Under Valence Feedback.

Farrokhi A, Habibi M, Daliri M Hum Brain Mapp. 2025; 46(2):e70105.

PMID: 39835585 PMC: 11747997. DOI: 10.1002/hbm.70105.


An fMRI study on the generalization of motor learning after brain actuated supernumerary robot training.

Liu Y, Huang S, Xu W, Wang Z, Ming D NPJ Sci Learn. 2024; 9(1):80.

PMID: 39738213 PMC: 11685389. DOI: 10.1038/s41539-024-00294-y.


References
1.
Dayan E, Cohen L . Neuroplasticity subserving motor skill learning. Neuron. 2011; 72(3):443-54. PMC: 3217208. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2011.10.008. View

2.
Dum R, Strick P . Frontal lobe inputs to the digit representations of the motor areas on the lateral surface of the hemisphere. J Neurosci. 2005; 25(6):1375-86. PMC: 6726000. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3902-04.2005. View

3.
Landau S, DEsposito M . Sequence learning in pianists and nonpianists: an fMRI study of motor expertise. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2007; 6(3):246-59. DOI: 10.3758/cabn.6.3.246. View

4.
Grafton S, Hazeltine E, Ivry R . Functional mapping of sequence learning in normal humans. J Cogn Neurosci. 2013; 7(4):497-510. DOI: 10.1162/jocn.1995.7.4.497. View

5.
Picton T, Stuss D, Alexander M, Shallice T, Binns M, Gillingham S . Effects of focal frontal lesions on response inhibition. Cereb Cortex. 2006; 17(4):826-38. DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhk031. View