» Articles » PMID: 23188547

Identification of Patients with Low-risk Pulmonary Embolism Suitable for Outpatient Treatment Using the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI)

Overview
Journal Ir J Med Sci
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2012 Nov 29
PMID 23188547
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There is increasing evidence that outpatient treatment of patients with low-risk stable pulmonary embolism (PE) is safe, effective and potentially reduces costs. It is not clear how many patients presenting to an Irish Emergency Department (ED) are potentially suitable for outpatient management.

Aims: To identify how many patients presenting to our ED over a 1-year period who were diagnosed with acute PE are potentially suitable for outpatient treatment.

Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted over a 1-year period. Clinical notes for patients who had a positive computed tomographic pulmonary angiogram (CTPA) within 24 h of presentation to the ED were examined to risk stratify the patients according to the pulmonary embolism severity index (PESI).

Results: Forty-seven patients who presented to our ED were diagnosed with a PE. Clinical notes were missing for 3 cases, and 44 cases were analysed further. The mean age was 64.3 (±16.8 SD) years and 24 (54.5 %, 95 % CI 40-68.3 %) were males. Six patients (13.6 %, 95 % CI 6.4-26.7 %) had a background of cancer. Fifteen cases (34.1 %, 95 % CI 21.9-48.7 %) were deemed to be low risk as they were categorised as PESI risk class I or II. Our study found that 61/420 (14.5 %, 95 % CI 11.5-18.2) of CTPAs done were positive for PE.

Conclusion: This study suggests that a significant percentage of patients diagnosed with acute PE are low risk as per PESI and therefore potentially suitable for outpatient management.

Citing Articles

Prognostic models in acute pulmonary embolism: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Elias A, Mallett S, Daoud-Elias M, Poggi J, Clarke M BMJ Open. 2016; 6(4):e010324.

PMID: 27130162 PMC: 4854007. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010324.


Developments in the management and treatment of pulmonary embolism.

Limbrey R, Howard L Eur Respir Rev. 2015; 24(137):484-97.

PMID: 26324810 PMC: 9487690. DOI: 10.1183/16000617.00006614.


Is the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index Being Routinely Used in Clinical Practice?.

Shafiq A, Lodhi H, Ahmed Z, Bajwa A Thrombosis. 2015; 2015:175357.

PMID: 26294971 PMC: 4532959. DOI: 10.1155/2015/175357.

References
1.
Aujesky D, Roy P, Verschuren F, Righini M, Osterwalder J, Egloff M . Outpatient versus inpatient treatment for patients with acute pulmonary embolism: an international, open-label, randomised, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2011; 378(9785):41-8. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60824-6. View

2.
Mamlouk M, vanSonnenberg E, Gosalia R, Drachman D, Gridley D, Zamora J . Pulmonary embolism at CT angiography: implications for appropriateness, cost, and radiation exposure in 2003 patients. Radiology. 2010; 256(2):625-32. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.10091624. View

3.
Stein P, Goodman L, Hull R, Dalen J, Matta F . Diagnosis and management of isolated subsegmental pulmonary embolism: review and assessment of the options. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2011; 18(1):20-6. DOI: 10.1177/1076029611422363. View

4.
Wells P, Kovacs M, Bormanis J, Forgie M, Goudie D, Morrow B . Expanding eligibility for outpatient treatment of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism with low-molecular-weight heparin: a comparison of patient self-injection with homecare injection. Arch Intern Med. 1998; 158(16):1809-12. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.158.16.1809. View

5.
Kovacs M, Anderson D, Morrow B, Gray L, Touchie D, Wells P . Outpatient treatment of pulmonary embolism with dalteparin. Thromb Haemost. 2000; 83(2):209-11. View