» Articles » PMID: 23184417

Application of PBPK Modeling to Predict Monoclonal Antibody Disposition in Plasma and Tissues in Mouse Models of Human Colorectal Cancer

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 2012 Nov 28
PMID 23184417
Citations 27
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This investigation evaluated the utility of a physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model, which incorporates model parameters representing key determinants of monoclonal antibody (mAb) target-mediated disposition, to predict, a priori, mAb disposition in plasma and in tissues, including tumors that express target antigens. Monte Carlo simulation techniques were employed to predict the disposition of two mAbs, 8C2 (as a non-binding control mouse IgG1 mAb) and T84.66 (a high-affinity murine IgG1 anti-carcinoembryonic antigen mAb), in mice bearing no tumors, or bearing colorectal HT29 or LS174T xenografts. Model parameters were obtained or derived from the literature. (125)I-T84.66 and (125)I-8C2 were administered to groups of SCID mice, and plasma and tissue concentrations were determined via gamma counting. The PBPK model well-predicted the experimental data. Comparisons of the population predicted versus observed areas under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC) for T84.66 were 95.4 ± 67.8 versus 84.0 ± 3.0, 1,859 ± 682 versus 2,370 ± 154, and 5,930 ± 1,375 versus 5,960 ± 317 (nM × day) at 1, 10, and 25 mg/kg in LS174T xenograft-bearing SCID mice; and 215 ± 72 versus 233 ± 30, 3,070 ± 346 versus 3,120 ± 180, and 7,884 ± 714 versus 7,440 ± 626 in HT29 xenograft-bearing mice. Model predicted versus observed 8C2 plasma AUCs were 312.4 ± 30 versus 182 ± 7.6 and 7,619 ± 738 versus 7,840 ± 24.3 (nM × day) at 1 and 25 mg/kg. High correlations were observed between the predicted median plasma concentrations and observed median plasma concentrations (r (2) = 0.927, for all combinations of treatment, dose, and tumor model), highlighting the utility of the PBPK model for the a priori prediction of in vivo data.

Citing Articles

Role of Gut Microbiota in Predisposition to Colon Cancer: A Narrative Review.

Kamath H, Shukla R, Shah U, Patel S, Das S, Chordia A Indian J Microbiol. 2024; 64(3):1-13.

PMID: 39282181 PMC: 11399513. DOI: 10.1007/s12088-024-01242-5.


A minimal physiologically based pharmacokinetic model to study the combined effect of antibody size, charge, and binding affinity to FcRn/antigen on antibody pharmacokinetics.

Patidar K, Pillai N, Dhakal S, Avery L, Mavroudis P J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2024; 51(5):477-492.

PMID: 38400996 PMC: 11576895. DOI: 10.1007/s10928-023-09899-z.


Review of the Existing Translational Pharmacokinetics Modeling Approaches Specific to Monoclonal Antibodies (mAbs) to Support the First-In-Human (FIH) Dose Selection.

Pasquiers B, Benamara S, Felices M, Nguyen L, Decleves X Int J Mol Sci. 2022; 23(21).

PMID: 36361546 PMC: 9657028. DOI: 10.3390/ijms232112754.


Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling to Predict PET Image Quality of Three Generations EGFR TKI in Advanced-Stage NSCLC Patients.

Bartelink I, van de Stadt E, Leeuwerik A, Thijssen V, Hupsel J, van den Nieuwendijk J Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022; 15(7).

PMID: 35890095 PMC: 9315544. DOI: 10.3390/ph15070796.


Recent Advances in Translational Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics Prediction of Therapeutic Antibodies Using Modeling and Simulation.

Haraya K, Tsutsui H, Komori Y, Tachibana T Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2022; 15(5).

PMID: 35631335 PMC: 9145563. DOI: 10.3390/ph15050508.


References
1.
Jain R . Normalizing tumor vasculature with anti-angiogenic therapy: a new paradigm for combination therapy. Nat Med. 2001; 7(9):987-9. DOI: 10.1038/nm0901-987. View

2.
Jain R . Physiological barriers to delivery of monoclonal antibodies and other macromolecules in tumors. Cancer Res. 1990; 50(3 Suppl):814s-819s. View

3.
Juweid M, Neumann R, Paik C, Sato J, van Osdol W, Weinstein J . Micropharmacology of monoclonal antibodies in solid tumors: direct experimental evidence for a binding site barrier. Cancer Res. 1992; 52(19):5144-53. View

4.
Maeda H . The enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect in tumor vasculature: the key role of tumor-selective macromolecular drug targeting. Adv Enzyme Regul. 2001; 41:189-207. DOI: 10.1016/s0065-2571(00)00013-3. View

5.
Fujimori K, Covell D, Fletcher J, Weinstein J . Modeling analysis of the global and microscopic distribution of immunoglobulin G, F(ab')2, and Fab in tumors. Cancer Res. 1989; 49(20):5656-63. View