» Articles » PMID: 23180896

The Measurement of Local Variation in Shape

Overview
Journal Evol Biol
Specialty Biology
Date 2012 Nov 28
PMID 23180896
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Geometric morphometrics comprises tools for measuring and analyzing shape as captured by an entire set of landmark configurations. Many interesting questions in evolutionary, genetic, and developmental research, however, are only meaningful at a local level, where a focus on "parts" or "traits" takes priority over properties of wholes. To study variational properties of such traits, current approaches partition configurations into subsets of landmarks which are then studied separately. This approach is unable to fully capture both variational and spatial characteristics of these subsets because interpretability of shape differences is context-dependent. Landmarks omitted from a partition usually contain information about that partition's shape. We present an interpolation-based approach that can be used to model shape differences at a local, infinitesimal level as a function of information available globally. This approach belongs in a large family of methods that see shape differences as continuous "fields" spanning an entire structure, for which landmarks serve as reference parameters rather than as data. We show, via analyses of simulated and real data, how interpolation models provide a more accurate representation of regional shapes than partitioned data. A key difference of this interpolation approach from current morphometric practice is that one must assume an explicit interpolation model, which in turn implies a particular kind of behavior of the regions between landmarks. This choice presents novel methodological challenges, but also an opportunity to incorporate and test biomechanical models that have sought to explain tissue-level processes underlying the generation of morphological shape.

Citing Articles

Patterned apoptosis has an instructive role for local growth and tissue shape regulation in a fast-growing epithelium.

Matamoro-Vidal A, Cumming T, Davidovic A, Levillayer F, Levayer R Curr Biol. 2024; 34(2):376-388.e7.

PMID: 38215743 PMC: 10808510. DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2023.12.031.


Facial growth and development trajectories based on three-dimensional images: geometric morphometrics with a deformation perspective.

Zhong Y, Cui D, Wen P, Wong H R Soc Open Sci. 2024; 11(1):231438.

PMID: 38204781 PMC: 10776214. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.231438.


Simulated trapping and trawling exert similar selection on fish morphology.

Thambithurai D, Racz A, Lindstrom J, Parsons K, Killen S Ecol Evol. 2022; 12(2):e8596.

PMID: 35169454 PMC: 8840878. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8596.


Investigation of age-related facial variation among Angelman syndrome patients.

Agbolade O, Nazri A, Yaakob R, Ghani A, Cheah Y Sci Rep. 2021; 11(1):20767.

PMID: 34675349 PMC: 8531312. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-99944-z.


Using Delaunay triangulation to sample whole-specimen color from digital images.

Valvo J, Aponte J, Daniel M, Dwinell K, Rodd H, Houle D Ecol Evol. 2021; 11(18):12468-12484.

PMID: 34594513 PMC: 8462138. DOI: 10.1002/ece3.7992.


References
1.
Ayroles J, Carbone M, Stone E, Jordan K, Lyman R, Magwire M . Systems genetics of complex traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Nat Genet. 2009; 41(3):299-307. PMC: 2752214. DOI: 10.1038/ng.332. View

2.
Workman M, Leamy L, Routman E, Cheverud J . Analysis of quantitative trait locus effects on the size and shape of mandibular molars in mice. Genetics. 2002; 160(4):1573-86. PMC: 1462040. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/160.4.1573. View

3.
McAlarney M, Chiu W . Comparison of numeric techniques in the analysis of cleft palate dental arch form change. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1997; 34(4):281-91. DOI: 10.1597/1545-1569_1997_034_0281_contit_2.3.co_2. View

4.
Richtsmeier J, Deleon V . Morphological integration of the skull in craniofacial anomalies. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2009; 12(3):149-58. PMC: 2804975. DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2009.01448.x. View

5.
Stelkens R, Schmid C, Selz O, Seehausen O . Phenotypic novelty in experimental hybrids is predicted by the genetic distance between species of cichlid fish. BMC Evol Biol. 2009; 9:283. PMC: 2796671. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-9-283. View