» Articles » PMID: 23179742

Exploring the Distribution and Determinants of a Change in Recovery Expectations Following Traumatic Injury to Victorian Workers

Overview
Journal J Occup Rehabil
Publisher Springer
Date 2012 Nov 27
PMID 23179742
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To examine the frequency, distribution and determinants of a change in recovery expectations following non-life threatening acute orthopaedic trauma to Victorian workers. It is proposed that interventions to modify recovery expectations may reduce the burden associated with injury. However, it is not known whether recovery expectations change over time or the factors that are associated with change.

Methods: A prospective inception cohort study was carried out in which participants were recruited following presentation to hospital for treatment of their injury and followed for 6 months post-injury. Baseline data was obtained by survey and medical record review. Binary logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with a change in recovery expectations between week 2 and week 12 post-injury.

Results: The cohort comprised injured workers (n = 145) who had sustained nonlife threatening acute orthopaedic trauma. Factors associated with an improvement in recovery expectations or recovery timeframe included more years of education and higher social functioning. Participants whose injury involved a perception of responsibility by a third party were 7.18 (95 % CI 1.86-27.68) times more likely to change their recovery expectations to more negative expectations and less likely to change to an earlier recovery timeframe. Participants with more severe injuries were more likely to change their recovery timeframe to a longer timeframe.

Conclusion: Change in recovery expectations provide some information on injured workers who may benefit from targeted interventions to improve or maintain recovery expectations. The post-injury time-point at which recovery expectations are measured is important if recovery expectations are to inform long-term outcomes.

Citing Articles

Expectations for Return to Work Predict Return to Work in Workers with Low Back Pain: An Individual Participant Data (IPD) Meta-Analysis.

Sullivan V, Wilson M, Gross D, Jensen O, Shaw W, Steenstra I J Occup Rehabil. 2022; 32(4):575-590.

PMID: 35152369 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-022-10027-w.


Do recovery expectations change over time?.

Kamper S, Kongsted A, Haanstra T, Hestbaek L Eur Spine J. 2014; 24(2):218-26.

PMID: 24913213 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-014-3380-1.


Returning to work following low back pain: towards a model of individual psychosocial factors.

Besen E, Young A, Shaw W J Occup Rehabil. 2014; 25(1):25-37.

PMID: 24846078 PMC: 4333236. DOI: 10.1007/s10926-014-9522-9.

References
1.
Lovibond P, LOVIBOND S . The structure of negative emotional states: comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behav Res Ther. 1995; 33(3):335-43. DOI: 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-u. View

2.
Baker S, ONeill B, HADDON Jr W, Long W . The injury severity score: a method for describing patients with multiple injuries and evaluating emergency care. J Trauma. 1974; 14(3):187-96. View

3.
Mondloch M, Cole D, Frank J . Does how you do depend on how you think you'll do? A systematic review of the evidence for a relation between patients' recovery expectations and health outcomes. CMAJ. 2001; 165(2):174-9. PMC: 81284. View

4.
Vowles K, Gross R . Work-related beliefs about injury and physical capability for work in individuals with chronic pain. Pain. 2003; 101(3):291-298. DOI: 10.1016/S0304-3959(02)00337-8. View

5.
MacKenzie E, Bosse M, Kellam J, Pollak A, Webb L, Swiontkowski M . Early predictors of long-term work disability after major limb trauma. J Trauma. 2006; 61(3):688-94. DOI: 10.1097/01.ta.0000195985.56153.68. View