Self-plagiarism in Academic Publishing: the Anatomy of a Misnomer
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
The paper discusses self-plagiarism and associated practices in scholarly publishing. It approaches at some length the conceptual issues raised by the notion of self-plagiarism. It distinguishes among and then examines the main families of arguments against self-plagiarism, as well as the question of possibly legitimate reasons to engage in this practice. It concludes that some of the animus frequently reserved for self-plagiarism may be the result of, among others, poor choice of a label, unwarranted generalizations as to its ill effects based on the specific experience (and goals) of particular disciplines, and widespread but not necessarily beneficial publishing practices.
Tingley D, Ashworth R, Torres Sanchez D, Mac Mahon G, Kusel Y, Rae B Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(4).
PMID: 38673377 PMC: 11050154. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21040466.
When it is and isn't OK to recycle text in scientific papers.
Nat Hum Behav. 2024; 8(3):401.
PMID: 38528195 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-024-01862-3.
Highlighting common pitfalls to avoid when writing the medical education manuscript.
Ligon B, Turner T, Thammasitboon S MedEdPublish (2016). 2024; 6:94.
PMID: 38406396 PMC: 10885260. DOI: 10.15694/mep.2017.000094.
Text Recycling in Scientific Writing.
Moskovitz C Sci Eng Ethics. 2018; 25(3):813-851.
PMID: 29546574 DOI: 10.1007/s11948-017-0008-y.
van Wesel M Sci Eng Ethics. 2015; 22(1):199-225.
PMID: 25742806 PMC: 4750571. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-015-9638-0.