» Articles » PMID: 23179068

Self-plagiarism in Academic Publishing: the Anatomy of a Misnomer

Overview
Journal Sci Eng Ethics
Date 2012 Nov 27
PMID 23179068
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The paper discusses self-plagiarism and associated practices in scholarly publishing. It approaches at some length the conceptual issues raised by the notion of self-plagiarism. It distinguishes among and then examines the main families of arguments against self-plagiarism, as well as the question of possibly legitimate reasons to engage in this practice. It concludes that some of the animus frequently reserved for self-plagiarism may be the result of, among others, poor choice of a label, unwarranted generalizations as to its ill effects based on the specific experience (and goals) of particular disciplines, and widespread but not necessarily beneficial publishing practices.

Citing Articles

Is the Invisibility of Dementia a Super-Power or a Curse? A Reflection on the SUNshiners' Questionnaire into the Public Understanding of Dementia as an Invisible Disability: A User-Led Research Project.

Tingley D, Ashworth R, Torres Sanchez D, Mac Mahon G, Kusel Y, Rae B Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024; 21(4).

PMID: 38673377 PMC: 11050154. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21040466.


When it is and isn't OK to recycle text in scientific papers.

Nat Hum Behav. 2024; 8(3):401.

PMID: 38528195 DOI: 10.1038/s41562-024-01862-3.


Highlighting common pitfalls to avoid when writing the medical education manuscript.

Ligon B, Turner T, Thammasitboon S MedEdPublish (2016). 2024; 6:94.

PMID: 38406396 PMC: 10885260. DOI: 10.15694/mep.2017.000094.


Text Recycling in Scientific Writing.

Moskovitz C Sci Eng Ethics. 2018; 25(3):813-851.

PMID: 29546574 DOI: 10.1007/s11948-017-0008-y.


Evaluation by Citation: Trends in Publication Behavior, Evaluation Criteria, and the Strive for High Impact Publications.

van Wesel M Sci Eng Ethics. 2015; 22(1):199-225.

PMID: 25742806 PMC: 4750571. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-015-9638-0.


References
1.
Berlin L . Plagiarism, salami slicing, and Lobachevsky. Skeletal Radiol. 2008; 38(1):1-4. DOI: 10.1007/s00256-008-0599-0. View

2.
Yank V, Barnes D . Consensus and contention regarding redundant publications in clinical research: cross-sectional survey of editors and authors. J Med Ethics. 2003; 29(2):109-14. PMC: 1733707. DOI: 10.1136/jme.29.2.109. View

3.
Kravitz R, Feldman M . From the Editors' Desk: Self-Plagiarism and Other Editorial Crimes and Misdemeanors. J Gen Intern Med. 2010; . PMC: 3024110. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-010-1562-z. View

4.
Ioannidis J . Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med. 2005; 2(8):e124. PMC: 1182327. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0020124. View

5.
Rogers L . Duplicate publications: it's not so much the duplicity as it is the deceit. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1999; 172(1):1-2. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.172.1.9888726. View