The Modelling Cycle for Collective Animal Behaviour

Overview

Journal Interface Focus

Specialty Biology

Date 2012 Nov 23

PMID 23173077

Citations 30

Authors

David J T Sumpter

Richard P Mann

Andrea Perna

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Collective animal behaviour is the study of how interactions between individuals produce group level patterns, and why these interactions have evolved. This study has proved itself uniquely interdisciplinary, involving physicists, mathematicians, engineers as well as biologists. Almost all experimental work in this area is related directly or indirectly to mathematical models, with regular movement back and forth between models, experimental data and statistical fitting. In this paper, we describe how the modelling cycle works in the study of collective animal behaviour. We classify studies as addressing questions at different levels or linking different levels, i.e. as local, local to global, global to local or global. We also describe three distinct approaches-theory-driven, data-driven and model selection-to these questions. We show, with reference to our own research on species across different taxa, how we move between these different levels of description and how these various approaches can be applied to link levels together.

Citing Articles

Metareview: a survey of active matter reviews.

Te Vrugt M, Wittkowski R Eur Phys J E Soft Matter. 2025; 48(3):12.

PMID: 40035927 PMC: 11880143. DOI: 10.1140/epje/s10189-024-00466-z.

Relative telencephalon size does not affect collective motion in the guppy ().

Boussard A, Ahlkvist M, Corral-Lopez A, Fong S, Fitzpatrick J, Kolm N Behav Ecol. 2024; 35(4):arae033.

PMID: 38779596 PMC: 11110457. DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arae033.

Sensory collectives in natural systems.

Williams H, Sridhar V, Hurme E, Gall G, Borrego N, Finerty G Elife. 2023; 12.

PMID: 38019274 PMC: 10686622. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.88028.

Is the neighborhood of interaction in human crowds metric, topological, or visual?.

Wirth T, Dachner G, Rio K, Warren W PNAS Nexus. 2023; 2(5):pgad118.

PMID: 37200800 PMC: 10187661. DOI: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad118.

The visual coupling between neighbours explains local interactions underlying human 'flocking'.

Dachner G, Wirth T, Richmond E, Warren W Proc Biol Sci. 2022; 289(1970):20212089.

PMID: 35232235 PMC: 8889174. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2021.2089.

References

Couzin I, Krause J, James R, Ruxton G, Franks N . Collective memory and spatial sorting in animal groups. J Theor Biol. 2002; 218(1):1-11. DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.2002.3065. View

Mann R, Perna A, Strombom D, Garnett R, Herbert-Read J, Sumpter D . Multi-scale inference of interaction rules in animal groups using Bayesian model selection. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012; 8(1):e1002308. PMC: 3252267. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002308. View

Bazazi S, Ioannou C, Simpson S, Sword G, Torney C, Lorch P . The social context of cannibalism in migratory bands of the Mormon cricket. PLoS One. 2010; 5(12):e15118. PMC: 3001859. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015118. View

Ginelli F, Chate H . Relevance of metric-free interactions in flocking phenomena. Phys Rev Lett. 2011; 105(16):168103. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.168103. View

Nicolis , Deneubourg . Emerging patterns and food recruitment in ants: an analytical study . J Theor Biol. 1999; 198(4):575-92. DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.1999.0934. View

Reid C, Sumpter D, Beekman M . Optimisation in a natural system: Argentine ants solve the Towers of Hanoi. J Exp Biol. 2010; 214(Pt 1):50-8. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.048173. View

Herbert-Read J, Perna A, Mann R, Schaerf T, Sumpter D, Ward A . Inferring the rules of interaction of shoaling fish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(46):18726-31. PMC: 3219133. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1109355108. View

Ballerini M, Cabibbo N, Candelier R, Cavagna A, Cisbani E, Giardina I . Interaction ruling animal collective behavior depends on topological rather than metric distance: evidence from a field study. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008; 105(4):1232-7. PMC: 2234121. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0711437105. View

Sokolov A, Aranson I, Kessler J, Goldstein R . Concentration dependence of the collective dynamics of swimming bacteria. Phys Rev Lett. 2007; 98(15):158102. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.158102. View

10.

Tammero L, Dickinson M . The influence of visual landscape on the free flight behavior of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster. J Exp Biol. 2002; 205(Pt 3):327-43. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.205.3.327. View

11.

Dussutour A, Nicolis S, Shephard G, Beekman M, Sumpter D . The role of multiple pheromones in food recruitment by ants. J Exp Biol. 2009; 212(Pt 15):2337-48. DOI: 10.1242/jeb.029827. View

12.

Strombom D . Collective motion from local attraction. J Theor Biol. 2011; 283(1):145-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2011.05.019. View

13.

Beekman M, Sumpter D, Ratnieks F . Phase transition between disordered and ordered foraging in Pharaoh's ants. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001; 98(17):9703-6. PMC: 55516. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.161285298. View

14.

Buhl C, Sumpter D, Couzin I, Hale J, Despland E, Miller E . From disorder to order in marching locusts. Science. 2006; 312(5778):1402-6. DOI: 10.1126/science.1125142. View

15.

Weitz S, Blanco S, Fournier R, Gautrais J, Jost C, Theraulaz G . Modeling collective animal behavior with a cognitive perspective: a methodological framework. PLoS One. 2012; 7(6):e38588. PMC: 3383699. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0038588. View

16.

Vicsek , Czirok , Cohen I , Shochet . Novel type of phase transition in a system of self-driven particles. Phys Rev Lett. 1995; 75(6):1226-1229. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.1226. View

17.

Dussutour A, Fourcassie V, Helbing D, Deneubourg J . Optimal traffic organization in ants under crowded conditions. Nature. 2004; 428(6978):70-3. DOI: 10.1038/nature02345. View

18.

Cavagna A, Cimarelli A, Giardina I, Parisi G, Santagati R, Stefanini F . Scale-free correlations in starling flocks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010; 107(26):11865-70. PMC: 2900681. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1005766107. View

19.

Bazazi S, Romanczuk P, Thomas S, Schimansky-Geier L, Hale J, Miller G . Nutritional state and collective motion: from individuals to mass migration. Proc Biol Sci. 2010; 278(1704):356-63. PMC: 3013415. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1447. View

20.

Galef Jr B, Giraldeau L . Social influences on foraging in vertebrates: causal mechanisms and adaptive functions. Anim Behav. 2001; 61(1):3-15. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1557. View