» Articles » PMID: 23170880

The Role of Protonation States in Ligand-receptor Recognition and Binding

Overview
Journal Curr Pharm Des
Date 2012 Nov 23
PMID 23170880
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this review we discuss the role of protonation states in receptor-ligand interactions, providing experimental evidences and computational predictions that complex formation may involve titratable groups with unusual pKa's and that protonation states frequently change from unbound to bound states. These protonation changes result in proton uptake/release, which in turn causes the pH-dependence of the binding. Indeed, experimental data strongly suggest that almost any binding is pH-dependent and to be correctly modeled, the protonation states must be properly assigned prior to and after the binding. One may accurately predict the protonation states when provided with the structures of the unbound proteins and their complex; however, the modeling becomes much more complicated if the bound state has to be predicted in a docking protocol or if the structures of either bound or unbound receptor-ligand are not available. The major challenges that arise in these situations are the coupling between binding and protonation states, and the conformational changes induced by the binding and ionization states of titratable groups. In addition, any assessment of the protonation state, either before or after binding, must refer to the pH of binding, which is frequently unknown. Thus, even if the pKa's of ionizable groups can be correctly assigned for both unbound and bound state, without knowing the experimental pH one cannot assign the corresponding protonation states, and consequently one cannot calculate the resulting proton uptake/release. It is pointed out, that while experimental pH may not be the physiological pH and binding may involve proton uptake/release, there is a tendency that the native receptor-ligand complexes have evolved toward specific either subcellular or tissue characteristic pH at which the proton uptake/release is either minimal or absent.

Citing Articles

Improved Structure-Based Histidine p Prediction for pH-Responsive Protein Design.

Hogues H, Wei W, Sulea T J Chem Inf Model. 2025; 65(3):1560-1569.

PMID: 39826152 PMC: 11815838. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.4c01957.


A dual experimental-theoretical perspective on ESPT photoacids and their challenges ahead.

Sulzner N, Jung G, Nuernberger P Chem Sci. 2025; 16(4):1560-1596.

PMID: 39759939 PMC: 11697080. DOI: 10.1039/d4sc07148d.


How to Personalize General Anesthesia-A Prospective Theoretical Approach to Conformational Changes of Halogenated Anesthetics in Fire Smoke Poisoning.

Truicu F, Damian R, Butoi M, Belghiru V, Rotaru L, Puticiu M Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(9).

PMID: 38731919 PMC: 11083261. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25094701.


PKAD-2: New entries and expansion of functionalities of the database of experimentally measured pKa's of proteins.

Ancona N, Bastola A, Alexov E J Comput Biophys Chem. 2023; 22(5):515-524.

PMID: 37520074 PMC: 10373500. DOI: 10.1142/s2737416523500230.


Activity Models of Key GPCR Families in the Central Nervous System: A Tool for Many Purposes.

El-Atawneh S, Goldblum A J Chem Inf Model. 2023; 63(11):3248-3262.

PMID: 37257045 PMC: 10268961. DOI: 10.1021/acs.jcim.2c01531.


References
1.
Parkes J, Gibson S, Liebman P . Temperature and pH dependence of the metarhodopsin I-metarhodopsin II equilibrium and the binding of metarhodopsin II to G protein in rod disk membranes. Biochemistry. 1999; 38(21):6862-78. DOI: 10.1021/bi9827666. View

2.
Luo S, Blom A, Rupp S, Hipler U, Hube B, Skerka C . The pH-regulated antigen 1 of Candida albicans binds the human complement inhibitor C4b-binding protein and mediates fungal complement evasion. J Biol Chem. 2011; 286(10):8021-8029. PMC: 3048689. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M110.130138. View

3.
Anand U, Kurup L, Mukherjee S . Deciphering the role of pH in the binding of ciprofloxacin hydrochloride to bovine serum albumin. Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2012; 14(12):4250-8. DOI: 10.1039/c2cp00001f. View

4.
Alexov E . Numerical calculations of the pH of maximal protein stability. The effect of the sequence composition and three-dimensional structure. Eur J Biochem. 2003; 271(1):173-85. DOI: 10.1046/j.1432-1033.2003.03917.x. View

5.
Elcock A, McCammon J . Calculation of weak protein-protein interactions: the pH dependence of the second virial coefficient. Biophys J. 2001; 80(2):613-25. PMC: 1301261. DOI: 10.1016/S0006-3495(01)76042-0. View