» Articles » PMID: 23169868

General Health Checks in Adults for Reducing Morbidity and Mortality from Disease: Cochrane Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview
Journal BMJ
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2012 Nov 22
PMID 23169868
Citations 118
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To quantify the benefits and harms of general health checks in adults with an emphasis on patient-relevant outcomes such as morbidity and mortality rather than on surrogate outcomes.

Design: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials. For mortality, we analysed the results with random effects meta-analysis, and for other outcomes we did a qualitative synthesis as meta-analysis was not feasible.

Data Sources: Medline, EMBASE, Healthstar, Cochrane Library, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, EPOC register, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP, supplemented by manual searches of reference lists of included studies, citation tracking (Web of Knowledge), and contacts with trialists.

Selection Criteria: Randomised trials comparing health checks with no health checks in adult populations unselected for disease or risk factors. Health checks defined as screening general populations for more than one disease or risk factor in more than one organ system. We did not include geriatric trials.

Data Extraction: Two observers independently assessed eligibility, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. We contacted authors for additional outcomes or trial details when necessary.

Results: We identified 16 trials, 14 of which had available outcome data (182,880 participants). Nine trials provided data on total mortality (11,940 deaths), and they gave a risk ratio of 0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.95 to 1.03). Eight trials provided data on cardiovascular mortality (4567 deaths), risk ratio 1.03 (0.91 to 1.17), and eight on cancer mortality (3663 deaths), risk ratio 1.01 (0.92 to 1.12). Subgroup and sensitivity analyses did not alter these findings. We did not find beneficial effects of general health checks on morbidity, hospitalisation, disability, worry, additional physician visits, or absence from work, but not all trials reported on these outcomes. One trial found that health checks led to a 20% increase in the total number of new diagnoses per participant over six years compared with the control group and an increased number of people with self reported chronic conditions, and one trial found an increased prevalence of hypertension and hypercholesterolaemia. Two out of four trials found an increased use of antihypertensives. Two out of four trials found small beneficial effects on self reported health, which could be due to bias.

Conclusions: General health checks did not reduce morbidity or mortality, neither overall nor for cardiovascular or cancer causes, although they increased the number of new diagnoses. Important harmful outcomes were often not studied or reported.

Systematic Review Registration: Cochrane Library, doi:10.1002/14651858.CD009009.

Citing Articles

A Comprehensive Health Screening Program Reveals the Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Ma D, Oh B, Bak E, Kim J, Lee J, Choi H Biomedicines. 2025; 12(12.

PMID: 39767587 PMC: 11727633. DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12122681.


Comparing a Digital Health Check With Traditional Nurse-Led Health Examinations Among Long-Term Unemployed Individuals: Comparison Study.

Raussi V, Kujala S, Horhammer I, Savolainen K, Autio R, Koskela T J Med Internet Res. 2024; 26:e49802.

PMID: 39412874 PMC: 11525086. DOI: 10.2196/49802.


Adherence to national guidelines for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer screenings in Japanese workplaces: a survey-based classification of enterprises' practices into "overscreening," "underscreening," and "guideline-adherence screening".

Minamitani M, Tatemichi M, Mukai T, Katano A, Ohira S, Nakagawa K BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):2223.

PMID: 39148101 PMC: 11325713. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-19775-1.


Prediction and causal inference of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases based on lifestyle questionnaires.

Nambo R, Karashima S, Mizoguchi R, Konishi S, Hashimoto A, Aono D Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):10492.

PMID: 38714730 PMC: 11076536. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-61047-w.


Influencing factors of health screening among retirees: an extended TPB approach.

Xu J, Pan Y, Li Q Front Public Health. 2024; 12:1320920.

PMID: 38584918 PMC: 10998445. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1320920.


References
1.
THORNER R, Djordjevic D, Vuckmanovic C, Pesic B, Culafic B, Mark F . A study to evaluate the effectiveness of multiphasic screening in Yugoslavia. Prev Med. 1973; 2(2):295-301. DOI: 10.1016/0091-7435(73)90072-8. View

2.
. A controlled trial of multiphasic screening in middle-age: results of the South-East London Screening Study. The South-East London Screening Study Group. Int J Epidemiol. 1977; 6(4):357-63. DOI: 10.1093/ije/6.4.357. View

3.
Sheridan S, Viera A, Krantz M, Ice C, Steinman L, Peters K . The effect of giving global coronary risk information to adults: a systematic review. Arch Intern Med. 2010; 170(3):230-9. DOI: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.516. View

4.
Sheridan S, Crespo E . Does the routine use of global coronary heart disease risk scores translate into clinical benefits or harms? A systematic review of the literature. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008; 8:60. PMC: 2294118. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-60. View

5.
Olsen D, Kane R, Proctor P . A controlled trial of multiphasic screening. N Engl J Med. 1976; 294(17):925-30. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM197604222941705. View