» Articles » PMID: 23162307

Genetic Counseling in Carriers of Reciprocal Translocations Involving Two Autosomes

Overview
Specialty Genetics
Date 2012 Nov 20
PMID 23162307
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

One of the main genetic causes involve in the pathogenesis of recurrent abortion is parental chromosomal abnormalities. The central concept in genetic counseling with such families is to estimate the probability of recurrence of unfavorable pregnancy outcomes. The main questions that consultants usually ask are: Why did this happen? What is the risk to be done again?Our cases were two families with repeated miscarriage. The pedigrees were drawn, the chromosomes of couples were studied, and estimation for recurrent risk was done. We tried to answer those two main questions and clear the results for them.Parental chromosome abnormalities were founded after karyotyping with GTG technique at 450 band resolution, revealing 46 chromosomes with balanced translocation of autosomes in one of the partner in both families. Recurrent risk was estimated as "high" for their future pregnancies in each family.Couples in which one partner is the carrier of such balanced translocation have increased risks of infertility, recurrent abortion, and delivery of chromosomally abnormal offspring. Genetic counseling of such couples, therefore, presents a unique challenge and should be considered in dealing with such families.

Citing Articles

Prevalence of karyotype alterations in couples with recurrent pregnancy loss in a tertiary center in Brazil.

Oliveira E, Cruzeiro I, de Souza C, Reis F Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2024; 46.

PMID: 38994459 PMC: 11239216. DOI: 10.61622/rbgo/2024rbgo51.


Cytogenetic Studies of 608 Couples with Recurrent Spontaneous Abortions in Northeastern Iran.

Soltani N, Mirzaei F, Ayatollahi H Iran J Pathol. 2021; 16(4):418-425.

PMID: 34567191 PMC: 8463753. DOI: 10.30699/IJP.2021.521514.2554.


Prevalence of Cytogenetic Anomalies in Couples with Recurrent Miscarriages: A Case-control Study.

Kalotra V, Lall M, Saviour P, Verma I, Kaur A J Hum Reprod Sci. 2018; 10(4):302-309.

PMID: 29430159 PMC: 5799936. DOI: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_68_17.

References
1.
Cammarata M, Corsello G, Marino M, Morabito M, Pecoraro M, Piccione M . Genetic factors of recurrent abortions. Acta Eur Fertil. 1989; 20(6):367-70. View

2.
Sachs E, Jahoda M, Van Hemel J, Hoogeboom A, Sandkuyl L . Chromosome studies of 500 couples with two or more abortions. Obstet Gynecol. 1985; 65(3):375-8. View

3.
Rosenhahn J, Weise A, Michel S, Hennig K, Hartmann I, Schiefner J . Cytogenetic characterisation and proteomic profiling of the Imatinib-resistant cell line KCL22-R. Int J Oncol. 2007; 31(1):121-8. View

4.
McArthur G . Dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: recent clinical progress. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007; 14(10):2876-86. DOI: 10.1245/s10434-007-9480-y. View

5.
Kovacheva K, Ahgelova L, Simeonova M, Tsankova G, Ionov M, Khristova V . [Active screening for genetic pathology in newborns. I. Registration of congenital abnormalities]. Akush Ginekol (Sofiia). 2004; 43(2):18-22. View