» Articles » PMID: 23161374

Does Using Comprehensive Preoperative Bowel Preparation Offer Any Advantage for Urinary Diversion Using Ileum? A Meta-analysis

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Nephrology
Date 2012 Nov 20
PMID 23161374
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of comprehensive bowel preparation to that of limited bowel preparation in prevention of postoperative complications in elective urinary diversion surgery by using ileum.

Methods: Literature search of PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library was done to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies involving comparison of postoperative complications after comprehensive bowel preparation and limited bowel preparation. A meta-analysis was carried out to distinguish overall differences between the two groups.

Results: Our literature search yielded two randomized controlled trials and two cohort studies, involving a total of 346 patients, which met our inclusion criteria. There was no significant difference between the comprehensive bowel preparation and limited bowel preparation in wound infection [relative risk (RR) 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.05(0.46-2.40); P = 0.86], mortality [RR 95 % CI, 1.06 (0.32-3.55); P = 0.76], ileus [RR 95 % CI, 0.86 (0.37, 2.00); P = 0.40], sepsis [RR 95 % CI, 0.71 (0.20, 2.52); P = 0.78], anastomotic leakage [RR 95 % CI, 0.81 (0.15, 4.21); P = 0.83], wound dehiscence [RR 95 % CI, 0.92 (0.40, 2.13); P = 0.67], peritonitis [RR 95 % CI, 0.64 (0.08, 5.10); P = 0.63] or fistula [RR 95 % CI, 0.71 (0.18,2.75); P = 0.63].

Conclusions: The limited evidence available demonstrated that the use of comprehensive bowel preparation for urinary diversion surgery using ileum does not offer any significant advantage over limited bowel preparation. Future work should target more high-quality RCTs to confirm this.

Citing Articles

Clinical efficacy and safety of enhanced recovery after surgery for patients treated with radical cystectomy and ileal urinary diversion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Feng D, Liu S, Lu Y, Wei W, Han P Transl Androl Urol. 2020; 9(4):1743-1753.

PMID: 32944535 PMC: 7475686. DOI: 10.21037/tau-19-941.


Does Postoperative Rehabilitation for Radical Cystectomy Call for Enhanced Recovery after Surgery? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Xiao J, Wang M, He W, Wang J, Yang F, Ma X Curr Med Sci. 2019; 39(1):99-110.

PMID: 30868498 DOI: 10.1007/s11596-019-2006-6.

References
1.
Wishnow K, Johnson D, Babaian R, Swanson D, Evans R, Von Eschenbach A . Effective outpatient use of polyethylene glycol-electrolyte bowel preparation for radical cystectomy and ileal conduit urinary diversion. Urology. 1988; 31(1):7-9. DOI: 10.1016/0090-4295(88)90561-4. View

2.
Freiha F . Preoperative bowel preparation in urologic surgery. J Urol. 1977; 118(6):955-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)58262-2. View

3.
Bucher P, Gervaz P, Soravia C, Mermillod B, ERNE M, Morel P . Randomized clinical trial of mechanical bowel preparation versus no preparation before elective left-sided colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2005; 92(4):409-14. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.4900. View

4.
Guenaga K, Matos D, Wille-Jorgensen P . Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; (9):CD001544. PMC: 7066937. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001544.pub4. View

5.
Aslan G, Baltaci S, Akdogan B, Kuyumcuoglu U, Kaplan M, Cal C . A prospective randomized multicenter study of Turkish Society of Urooncology comparing two different mechanical bowel preparation methods for radical cystectomy. Urol Oncol. 2011; 31(5):664-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.03.009. View