» Articles » PMID: 23152831

Comparing Linkage Designs Based on Land Facets to Linkage Designs Based on Focal Species

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2012 Nov 16
PMID 23152831
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Least-cost modeling for focal species is the most widely used method for designing conservation corridors and linkages. However, these designs depend on today's land covers, which will be altered by climate change. We recently proposed an alternative approach based on land facets (recurring landscape units of relatively uniform topography and soils). The rationale is that corridors with high continuity of individual land facets will facilitate movement of species associated with each facet today and in the future. Conservation practitioners might like to know whether a linkage design based on land facets is likely to provide continuity of modeled breeding habitat for species needing connectivity today, and whether a linkage for focal species provides continuity and interspersion of land facets. To address these questions, we compared linkages designed for focal species and land facets in three landscapes in Arizona, USA. We used two variables to measure linkage utility, namely distances between patches of modeled breeding habitat for 5-16 focal species in each linkage, and resistance profiles for focal species and land facets between patches connected by the linkage. Compared to focal species designs, linkage designs based on land facets provided as much or more modeled habitat connectivity for 25 of 28 species-landscape combinations, failing only for the three species with the most narrowly distributed habitat. Compared to land facets designs, focal species linkages provided lower connectivity for about half the land facets in two landscapes. In areas where a focal species approach to linkage design is not possible, our results suggest that conservation practitioners may be able to implement a land facets approach with some confidence that the linkage design would serve most potential focal species. In areas where focal species designs are possible, we recommend using the land facet approach to complement, rather than replace, focal species approaches.

Citing Articles

A multispecies corridor in a fragmented landscape: Evaluating effectiveness and identifying high-priority target areas.

DeMatteo K, Escalante O, Ibanez Alegre D, Rinas M, Sotorres D, Arguelles C PLoS One. 2023; 18(4):e0283258.

PMID: 37053238 PMC: 10101518. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283258.


Landscape-scale conservation design across biotic realms: sequential integration of aquatic and terrestrial landscapes.

Leonard P, Baldwin R, Hanks R Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):14556.

PMID: 29109425 PMC: 5673968. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-15304-w.


Using niche-modelling and species-specific cost analyses to determine a multispecies corridor in a fragmented landscape.

DeMatteo K, Rinas M, Zurano J, Selleski N, Schneider R, Arguelles C PLoS One. 2017; 12(8):e0183648.

PMID: 28841692 PMC: 5571917. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183648.

References
1.
Anderson M, Ferree C . Conserving the stage: climate change and the geophysical underpinnings of species diversity. PLoS One. 2010; 5(7):e11554. PMC: 2904386. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011554. View

2.
Klein C, Wilson K, Watts M, Stein J, Berry S, Carwardine J . Incorporating ecological and evolutionary processes into continental-scale conservation planning. Ecol Appl. 2009; 19(1):206-17. DOI: 10.1890/07-1684.1. View

3.
Moritz C . Strategies to protect biological diversity and the evolutionary processes that sustain it. Syst Biol. 2002; 51(2):238-54. DOI: 10.1080/10635150252899752. View

4.
Rouget M, Cowling R, Lombard A, T Knight A, Kerley G . Designing large-scale conservation corridors for pattern and process. Conserv Biol. 2006; 20(2):549-61. DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2006.00297.x. View

5.
Pressey R, Cabeza M, Watts M, Cowling R, Wilson K . Conservation planning in a changing world. Trends Ecol Evol. 2007; 22(11):583-92. DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2007.10.001. View