» Articles » PMID: 23152102

Closed-loop Control of Zebrafish Response Using a Bioinspired Robotic-fish in a Preference Test

Overview
Date 2012 Nov 16
PMID 23152102
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this paper, we study the response of zebrafish to a robotic-fish whose morphology and colour pattern are inspired by zebrafish. Experiments are conducted in a three-chambered instrumented water tank where a robotic-fish is juxtaposed with an empty compartment, and the preference of live subjects is scored as the mean time spent in the vicinity of the tank's two lateral sides. The tail-beating of the robotic-fish is controlled in real-time based on feedback from fish motion to explore a spectrum of closed-loop systems, including proportional and integral controllers. Closed-loop control systems are complemented by open-loop strategies, wherein the tail-beat of the robotic-fish is independent of the fish motion. The preference space and the locomotory patterns of fish for each experimental condition are analysed and compared to understand the influence of real-time closed-loop control on zebrafish response. The results of this study show that zebrafish respond differently to the pattern of tail-beating motion executed by the robotic-fish. Specifically, the preference and behaviour of zebrafish depend on whether the robotic-fish tail-beating frequency is controlled as a function of fish motion and how such closed-loop control is implemented.

Citing Articles

Selective effects of conspecific movement on social preference in zebrafish (Danio rerio) using real-time 3D tracking and 3D animation.

Kuroda T, Ritchey C, Podlesnik C Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):10502.

PMID: 37380673 PMC: 10307799. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-37579-y.


Learning Rat-Like Behavioral Interaction Using a Small-Scale Robotic Rat.

Xie H, Gao Z, Jia G, Shimoda S, Shi Q Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2023; 4:0032.

PMID: 37342211 PMC: 10278959. DOI: 10.34133/cbsystems.0032.


After 150 years of watching: is there a need for synthetic ethology?.

Abdai J, Miklosi A Anim Cogn. 2022; 26(1):261-274.

PMID: 36445574 PMC: 9877063. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-022-01719-0.


Driving singing behaviour in songbirds using a multi-modal, multi-agent virtual environment.

Larsen L, Adam I, Berman G, Hallam J, Elemans C Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):13414.

PMID: 35927295 PMC: 9352672. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-16456-0.


Mathematical modeling of zebrafish social behavior in response to acute caffeine administration.

Tuqan M, Porfiri M Front Appl Math Stat. 2022; 7.

PMID: 35493317 PMC: 9053518. DOI: 10.3389/fams.2021.751351.


References
1.
Wong K, Elegante M, Bartels B, Elkhayat S, Tien D, Roy S . Analyzing habituation responses to novelty in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Behav Brain Res. 2009; 208(2):450-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.12.023. View

2.
Pather S, Gerlai R . Shuttle box learning in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Behav Brain Res. 2008; 196(2):323-7. PMC: 2615810. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.09.013. View

3.
Reebs . Can a minority of informed leaders determine the foraging movements of a fish shoal?. Anim Behav. 2000; 59(2):403-409. DOI: 10.1006/anbe.1999.1314. View

4.
Marras S, Porfiri M . Fish and robots swimming together: attraction towards the robot demands biomimetic locomotion. J R Soc Interface. 2012; 9(73):1856-68. PMC: 3385770. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2012.0084. View

5.
Gerlai R, Fernandes Y, Pereira T . Zebrafish (Danio rerio) responds to the animated image of a predator: towards the development of an automated aversive task. Behav Brain Res. 2009; 201(2):318-24. PMC: 2885451. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2009.03.003. View