» Articles » PMID: 23151939

Characterizing Long-term Land Use/cover Change in the United States from 1850 to 2000 Using a Nonlinear Bi-analytical Model

Overview
Journal Ambio
Date 2012 Nov 16
PMID 23151939
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

We relate the historical (1850-2000) spatial and temporal changes in cropland cover in the conterminous United States to several socio-economic and biophysical determinants using an eco-region based spatial framework. Results show population density as a major determinant during the nineteenth century, and biophysical suitability as the major determinant during the twentieth century. We further examine the role of technological innovations, socio-economic and socio-ecological feedbacks that have either sustained or altered the cropland trajectories in different eco-regions. The cropland trajectories for each of the 84 level-III eco-regions were analyzed using a nonlinear bi-analytical model. In the Eastern United States, low biophysically suitable eco-regions, e.g., New England, have shown continual decline in the cropland after reaching peak levels. The cropland trajectories in high biophysically suitable regions, e.g., Corn Belt, have stabilized after reaching peak levels. In the Western United States, low-intensity crop cover (<10 %) is sustained with irrigation support. A slower rate of land conversion was found in the industrial period. Significant effect of Conservation Reserve Program on planted crop area is found in last two decades (1990-2010).

Citing Articles

Crop yield response to climate change varies with crop spatial distribution pattern.

Leng G, Huang M Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):1463.

PMID: 28469171 PMC: 5431105. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-01599-2.


Analyzing historical land use changes using a Historical Land Use Reconstruction Model: a case study in Zhenlai County, northeastern China.

Yang Y, Zhang S, Liu Y, Xing X, de Sherbinin A Sci Rep. 2017; 7:41275.

PMID: 28134342 PMC: 5278372. DOI: 10.1038/srep41275.

References
1.
Gruber N, Galloway J . An Earth-system perspective of the global nitrogen cycle. Nature. 2008; 451(7176):293-6. DOI: 10.1038/nature06592. View

2.
Howarth R, Boyer E, Pabich W, Galloway J . Nitrogen use in the United States from 1961-2000 and potential future trends. Ambio. 2002; 31(2):88-96. DOI: 10.1579/0044-7447-31.2.88. View

3.
Tilman D, Hill J, Lehman C . Carbon-negative biofuels from low-input high-diversity grassland biomass. Science. 2006; 314(5805):1598-600. DOI: 10.1126/science.1133306. View

4.
Mehaffey M, Smith E, Van Remortel R . Midwest U.S. landscape change to 2020 driven by biofuel mandates. Ecol Appl. 2012; 22(1):8-19. DOI: 10.1890/10-1573.1. View

5.
Ramankutty N, Foley J, Olejniczak N . People on the land: changes in global population and croplands during the 20th century. Ambio. 2002; 31(3):251-7. View