» Articles » PMID: 23150093

Transmastoid Galvanic Stimulation Does Not Affect the Vergence-mediated Gain Increase of the Human Angular Vestibulo-ocular Reflex

Overview
Journal Exp Brain Res
Specialty Neurology
Date 2012 Nov 15
PMID 23150093
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Vergence is one of several viewing contexts that require an increase in the angular vestibular-ocular reflex (aVOR) response. A previous monkey study found that the vergence-mediated gain (eye/head velocity) increase of the aVOR was attenuated by 64 % when anodic currents, which preferentially lower the activity of irregularly firing vestibular afferents, were delivered to both labyrinths. We sought to determine whether there was similar evidence implicating a role for irregular afferents in the vergence-mediated gain increase of the human aVOR. Our study is based upon analysis of the aVOR evoked by head rotations, delivered passively while subjects viewed a near (15 cm) or far (124 cm) target and applying galvanic vestibular stimulation (GVS) via surface electrodes. We tested 12 subjects during 2-3 sessions each. Vestibular stimuli consisted of passive whole-body rotations (sinusoids from 0.05-3 Hz and 12-25°/s, and transients with peak ~15°, 50°/s, 500°/s(2)) and head-on-body impulses (peak ~30°, 150°/s, 3,000°/s(2)). GVS was on for 10 s every 20 s. All polarity combinations were tested, with emphasis on uni- and bi-lateral anodic inhibition. The average stimulus current was 5.9 ± 1.6 mA (range: 3-9.5 mA), vergence angle (during near viewing) was 22.6 ± 2.8° and slow-phase eye velocity caused by left anodic current stimulation with head stationary was -3.4 ± 1.1°/s, -0.2 ± 0.6°/s and 2.5 ± 1.4°/s (torsion, vertical, horizontal). No statistically significant GVS effects were observed, suggesting that surface electrode GVS has no effect on the vergence-mediated gain increase of the aVOR at the current levels (~6 mA) tolerated by most humans. We conclude that clinically practical transmastoid GVS does not effectively silence irregular afferents and hypothesize that currents >10 mA are needed to reproduce the monkey results.

Citing Articles

Is the manual following response an attempt to compensate for inferred self-motion?.

Zhang Y, Brenner E, Duysens J, Verschueren S, Smeets J Exp Brain Res. 2019; 237(10):2549-2558.

PMID: 31342107 PMC: 6751223. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-019-05607-x.


Core Body Temperature Effects on the Mouse Vestibulo-ocular Reflex.

Hubner P, Khan S, Lasker D, Migliaccio A J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2017; 18(6):827-835.

PMID: 28755310 PMC: 5688047. DOI: 10.1007/s10162-017-0639-3.

References
1.
Lasker D, Ramat S, Carey J, Minor L . Vergence-mediated modulation of the human horizontal angular VOR provides evidence of pathway-specific changes in VOR dynamics. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2002; 956:324-37. DOI: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2002.tb02831.x. View

2.
Schneider E, Glasauer S, Dieterich M . Comparison of human ocular torsion patterns during natural and galvanic vestibular stimulation. J Neurophysiol. 2002; 87(4):2064-73. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00558.2001. View

3.
Minor L . Intratympanic gentamicin for control of vertigo in Meniere's disease: vestibular signs that specify completion of therapy. Am J Otol. 1999; 20(2):209-19. View

4.
SNYDER L, King W . Effect of viewing distance and location of the axis of head rotation on the monkey's vestibuloocular reflex. I. Eye movement responses. J Neurophysiol. 1992; 67(4):861-74. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1992.67.4.861. View

5.
Goldberg J . Afferent diversity and the organization of central vestibular pathways. Exp Brain Res. 2000; 130(3):277-97. PMC: 3731078. DOI: 10.1007/s002210050033. View