» Articles » PMID: 23144832

A Multi-population Consensus Genetic Map Reveals Inconsistent Marker Order Among Maps Likely Attributed to Structural Variations in the Apple Genome

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2012 Nov 13
PMID 23144832
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Genetic maps serve as frameworks for determining the genetic architecture of quantitative traits, assessing structure of a genome, as well as aid in pursuing association mapping and comparative genetic studies. In this study, a dense genetic map was constructed using a high-throughput 1,536 EST-derived SNP GoldenGate genotyping platform and a global consensus map established by combining the new genetic map with four existing reliable genetic maps of apple. The consensus map identified markers with both major and minor conflicts in positioning across all five maps. These major inconsistencies among marker positions were attributed either to structural variations within the apple genome, or among mapping populations, or genotyping technical errors. These also highlighted problems in assembly and anchorage of the reference draft apple genome sequence in regions with known segmental duplications. Markers common across all five apple genetic maps resulted in successful positioning of 2875 markers, consisting of 2033 SNPs and 843 SSRs as well as other specific markers, on the global consensus map. These markers were distributed across all 17 linkage groups, with an average of 169±33 marker per linkage group and with an average distance of 0.70±0.14 cM between markers. The total length of the consensus map was 1991.38 cM with an average length of 117.14±24.43 cM per linkage group. A total of 569 SNPs were mapped onto the genetic map, consisting of 140 recombinant individuals, from our recently developed apple Oligonucleotide pool assays (OPA). The new functional SNPs, along with the dense consensus genetic map, will be useful for high resolution QTL mapping of important traits in apple and for pursuing comparative genetic studies in Rosaceae.

Citing Articles

Comparative genetic mapping and a consensus interspecific genetic map reveal strong synteny and collinearity within the genus.

Ollitrault P, Hufnagel B, Curk F, Perdereau A, Mournet P, Miranda M Front Plant Sci. 2024; 15:1475965.

PMID: 39737380 PMC: 11682908. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1475965.


A high-density integrated map for grapevine based on three mapping populations genotyped by the Vitis18K SNP chip.

Vervalle J, Costantini L, Lorenzi S, Pindo M, Mora R, Bolognesi G Theor Appl Genet. 2022; 135(12):4371-4390.

PMID: 36271055 PMC: 9734222. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-022-04225-6.


Consensus genetic map and QTLs for morphological and agronomical traits in mungbean using DArT markers.

Vu T, Kilian A, Carling J, Lawn R Physiol Mol Biol Plants. 2022; 28(6):1277-1295.

PMID: 35910434 PMC: 9334499. DOI: 10.1007/s12298-022-01201-8.


Construction of a High-Density Genetic Map of (Berg.) Burret, an Outcrossing Species, Based on Two Connected Mapping Populations.

Quezada M, Amadeu R, Vignale B, Cabrera D, Pritsch C, Garcia A Front Plant Sci. 2021; 12:626811.

PMID: 33708232 PMC: 7940835. DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.626811.


From Genetic Maps to QTL Cloning: An Overview for Durum Wheat.

Colasuonno P, Marcotuli I, Gadaleta A, Soriano J Plants (Basel). 2021; 10(2).

PMID: 33562160 PMC: 7914919. DOI: 10.3390/plants10020315.


References
1.
Wang J, Lydiate D, Parkin I, Falentin C, Delourme R, Carion P . Integration of linkage maps for the Amphidiploid Brassica napus and comparative mapping with Arabidopsis and Brassica rapa. BMC Genomics. 2011; 12:101. PMC: 3042011. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-101. View

2.
Celton J, Chagne D, Tustin S, Terakami S, Nishitani C, Yamamoto T . Update on comparative genome mapping between Malus and Pyrus. BMC Res Notes. 2009; 2:182. PMC: 2749866. DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-2-182. View

3.
Liebhard R, Koller B, Gianfranceschi L, Gessler C . Creating a saturated reference map for the apple (Malus x domestica Borkh.) genome. Theor Appl Genet. 2003; 106(8):1497-508. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-003-1209-0. View

4.
Jackson B, Aluru S, Schnable P . Consensus genetic maps: a graph theoretic approach. Proc IEEE Comput Syst Bioinform Conf. 2006; :35-43. DOI: 10.1109/csb.2005.26. View

5.
Yan Z, Denneboom C, Hattendorf A, Dolstra O, Debener T, Stam P . Construction of an integrated map of rose with AFLP, SSR, PK, RGA, RFLP, SCAR and morphological markers. Theor Appl Genet. 2005; 110(4):766-77. DOI: 10.1007/s00122-004-1903-6. View