» Articles » PMID: 23143146

Closing Midline Abdominal Incisions

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 2012 Nov 13
PMID 23143146
Citations 29
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The most important wound complications are surgical site infection, wound dehiscence and incisional hernia. Experimental and clinical evidences support that the development of wound complications is closely related to the surgical technique at wound closure.

Results: The suture technique monitored through the suture length-to-wound length ratio is of major importance for the development of wound complications. The risk of wound dehiscence is low with a high ratio. The ratio must be higher than 4; otherwise, the risk of developing an incisional hernia is increased four times. With a ratio higher than 4, both the rate of wound infection and incisional hernia are significantly lower if closure is done with small stitches placed 5 to 8 mm from the wound edge than with larger stitches placed more than 10 mm from the wound edge.

Conclusions: Midline incisions should be closed in one layer by a continuous suture technique. A monofilament suture material should be used and be tied with self-locking knots. Excessive tension should not be placed on the suture. Wounds must always be closed with a suture length-to-wound length ratio higher than 4. The only way to ascertain this is to measure, calculate and document the ratio at every wound closure. A high ratio should be accomplished with many small stitches placed 5 to 8 mm from the wound edge at very short intervals.

Citing Articles

Assessment of Postoperative Complications Between Interrupted Modified Smead-Jones Rectus Closure and Conventional Rectus Closure in Midline Laparotomy Wounds: A Comparative Study.

Shankar A, Sreedevi B, Selvamuthukumaran S, Rajput S, Kumar P Cureus. 2024; 16(10):e72712.

PMID: 39618671 PMC: 11606635. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.72712.


Tensile testing in feline ventral abdominal coeliotomy closure with different sizes of polydioxanone suture material: a biomechanical study.

Jaenich S, Bartkowiak T, Jopek H, Brunnberg M, Slunsky P J Feline Med Surg. 2024; 26(9):1098612X241271871.

PMID: 39287368 PMC: 11430193. DOI: 10.1177/1098612X241271871.


Buttressing Sutures at the Center of the Mesh May Reduce the Probability of Recurrence in Onlay Incisional Hernia Repair: A Single-Center Study.

Demir M, Akalin C Cureus. 2024; 16(3):e56471.

PMID: 38638753 PMC: 11025695. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.56471.


The Best Closure Technique Without Mesh in Elective Midline Laparotomy Closure.

Fortelny R J Abdom Wall Surg. 2024; 1:10962.

PMID: 38314158 PMC: 10831662. DOI: 10.3389/jaws.2022.10962.


[Incisional hernias: epidemiology, evidence and guidelines].

Fortelny R, Dietz U Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2023; 95(1):3-9.

PMID: 38078933 PMC: 10781829. DOI: 10.1007/s00104-023-01999-3.


References
1.
Carlson M, Chakkalakal D . Tensile properties of the murine ventral vertical midline incision. PLoS One. 2011; 6(9):e24212. PMC: 3168469. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024212. View

2.
Israelsson L, Jonsson T . Suture length to wound length ratio and healing of midline laparotomy incisions. Br J Surg. 1993; 80(10):1284-6. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800801020. View

3.
Carlson M . Acute wound failure. Surg Clin North Am. 1997; 77(3):607-36. DOI: 10.1016/s0039-6109(05)70571-5. View

4.
POLLOCK A, Evans M . Early prediction of late incisional hernias. Br J Surg. 1989; 76(9):953-4. DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800760926. View

5.
Israelsson L, Wimo A . Cost minimisation analysis of change in closure technique of midline incisions. Eur J Surg. 2000; 166(8):642-6. DOI: 10.1080/110241500750008312. View