The Time Course of Attentional Deployment in Contextual Cueing
Overview
Affiliations
The time course of attention is a major characteristic on which different types of attention diverge. In addition to explicit goals and salient stimuli, spatial attention is influenced by past experience. In contextual cueing, behaviorally relevant stimuli are more quickly found when they appear in a spatial context that has previously been encountered than when they appear in a new context. In this study, we investigated the time that it takes for contextual cueing to develop following the onset of search layout cues. In three experiments, participants searched for a T target in an array of Ls. Each array was consistently associated with a single target location. In a testing phase, we manipulated the stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between the repeated spatial layout and the search display. Contextual cueing was equivalent for a wide range of SOAs between 0 and 1,000 ms. The lack of an increase in contextual cueing with increasing cue durations suggests that as an implicit learning mechanism, contextual cueing cannot be effectively used until search begins.
Across-trial spatial suppression in visual search.
Wang L, Wang B, Theeuwes J Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021; 83(7):2744-2752.
PMID: 34173208 PMC: 8460537. DOI: 10.3758/s13414-021-02341-x.
Contextual Cueing Effect Under Rapid Presentation.
Xie X, Chen S, Zang X Front Psychol. 2021; 11:603520.
PMID: 33424716 PMC: 7793704. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.603520.
Response time modeling reveals multiple contextual cuing mechanisms.
Sewell D, Colagiuri B, Livesey E Psychon Bull Rev. 2017; 25(5):1644-1665.
PMID: 28840573 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-017-1364-y.
Explicit goal-driven attention, unlike implicitly learned attention, spreads to secondary tasks.
Addleman D, Tao J, Remington R, Jiang Y J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2017; 44(3):356-366.
PMID: 28795835 PMC: 5809231. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000457.
Habitual versus goal-driven attention.
Jiang Y Cortex. 2017; 102:107-120.
PMID: 28734549 PMC: 5754262. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.06.018.