» Articles » PMID: 23132457

Assessment of Tear Film Stability in Dry Eye with a Newly Developed Keratograph

Overview
Journal Cornea
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2012 Nov 8
PMID 23132457
Citations 61
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the applicability of a newly developed corneal topographer in assessing tear film stability.

Methods: This is a prospective, case-control study. Forty-four Chinese dry eye patients and 41 normal subjects were recruited. Noninvasive tear film break-up time (NI-BUT) was measured using a new method based on a corneal topographer equipped with modified scan software. The reliability of the measurements was determined. Then, the correlations between the NI-BUT and the traditional fluorescein tear film break-up time, Schirmer I test values, and inferior tear meniscus height measurements were determined. The receiver operating characteristic curve technique was used to evaluate the NI-BUT examination in the diagnosis of dry eye.

Results: In total, a significant difference between the NI-BUT and the fluorescein tear film break-up time was found (3.2 ± 2.3 seconds vs. 5.2 ± 3.4 seconds; P < 0.001). The coefficient of variation and intraclass correlation coefficient values of NI-BUT were 12.8% and 0.93, respectively, for NI-BUT for intraobserver repeatability and 15.4% and 0.88, respectively for interobserver repeatability. The NI-BUT showed a good correlation with other dry eye examinations (all P < 0.05). In addition, the NI-BUT was significantly shorter in dry eye patients (2.0 ± 0.2 seconds) than in normal subjects (4.3 ± 0.3 seconds; P < 0.001). When the cutoff value was set at <2.65 seconds, the sensitivity and specificity of the test were 84.1% and 75.6%, respectively.

Conclusions: Measurements of NI-BUT obtained with the newly developed corneal topographer may provide a simple, noninvasive screening test for dry eyes with acceptable sensitivity, specificity, and repeatability.

Citing Articles

Comparing the corneal temperature of dry eyes with that of normal eyes via high-resolution infrared thermography.

Wu C, Huang Y, Xu B, Li B, Zhuang S, Cao G Front Med (Lausanne). 2025; 11():1526165.

PMID: 39845827 PMC: 11753212. DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1526165.


Comparison of therapeutic effects of 0.05% Cyclosporine A versus 0.1% Fluorometholone in Chinese patients with mild dry eye unresponsive to artificial tears: a randomized control study.

Gao H, Zhao L, Du A, Zhang X, Chai M, Liu L BMC Ophthalmol. 2024; 24(1):513.

PMID: 39604906 PMC: 11603962. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-024-03771-5.


Diagnostic Performance of Visionix VX120+ Platform for Dry Eye Screening.

Martinez-Plaza E, Barberan-Bernardos L, Molina-Martin A, Pinero D Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(20).

PMID: 39451598 PMC: 11506794. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14202276.


Detection of Subclinical Neurotrophic Keratopathy by Noncontact Esthesiometry.

Villalba M, Sabates V, Orgul S, Perez V, Swaminathan S, Sabater A Ophthalmol Ther. 2024; 13(9):2393-2404.

PMID: 39028450 PMC: 11341800. DOI: 10.1007/s40123-024-00998-9.


Dry eye disease in systemic lupus erythematosus: a cross sectional study.

Kang S, Wang Y, Zhang Q, Wang Z, Chen G Int J Ophthalmol. 2024; 17(7):1255-1261.

PMID: 39026910 PMC: 11246925. DOI: 10.18240/ijo.2024.07.09.