» Articles » PMID: 23124935

Rituximab in the Treatment of Refractory Adult and Juvenile Dermatomyositis and Adult Polymyositis: a Randomized, Placebo-phase Trial

Abstract

Objective: To assess the safety and efficacy of rituximab in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-phase trial in adult and pediatric myositis patients.

Methods: Adults with refractory polymyositis (PM) and adults and children with refractory dermatomyositis (DM) were enrolled. Entry criteria included muscle weakness and ≥2 additional abnormal values on core set measures (CSMs) for adults. Juvenile DM patients required ≥3 abnormal CSMs, with or without muscle weakness. Patients were randomized to receive either rituximab early or rituximab late, and glucocorticoid or immunosuppressive therapy was allowed at study entry. The primary end point compared the time to achieve the International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies Group preliminary definition of improvement (DOI) between the 2 groups. The secondary end points were the time to achieve ≥20% improvement in muscle strength and the proportions of patients in the early and late rituximab groups achieving the DOI at week 8.

Results: Among 200 randomized patients (76 with PM, 76 with DM, and 48 with juvenile DM), 195 showed no difference in the time to achieving the DOI between the rituximab late (n = 102) and rituximab early (n = 93) groups (P = 0.74 by log rank test), with a median time to achieving a DOI of 20.2 weeks and 20.0 weeks, respectively. The secondary end points also did not significantly differ between the 2 treatment groups. However, 161 (83%) of the randomized patients met the DOI, and individual CSMs improved in both groups throughout the 44-week trial.

Conclusion: Although there were no significant differences in the 2 treatment arms for the primary and secondary end points, 83% of adult and juvenile myositis patients with refractory disease met the DOI. The role of B cell-depleting therapies in myositis warrants further study, with consideration for a different trial design.

Citing Articles

Immunobiologics in juvenile dermatomyositis: a systematic review of promising therapeutic advances.

de Oliveira Rocha A, Ribeiro G, Silva J Reumatologia. 2025; 62(6):447-455.

PMID: 39866309 PMC: 11758102. DOI: 10.5114/reum/195799.


Safety and efficacy of CAR-T cell therapy in patients with autoimmune diseases: a systematic review.

Kattamuri L, Mohan Lal B, Vojjala N, Jain M, Sharma K, Jain S Rheumatol Int. 2025; 45(1):18.

PMID: 39754644 DOI: 10.1007/s00296-024-05772-5.


Dyslipidemia in Juvenile Dermatomyositis.

Khojah A, Morgan G, Kadakia A, Klein-Gitelman M, Pachman L Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):26528.

PMID: 39489760 PMC: 11532421. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-77985-4.


Ringing in the Patient Voice: Measuring Patients' Lived Experience of Dermatomyositis Symptoms.

Ardalan K, Rider L J Rheumatol. 2024; 51(12):1156-1159.

PMID: 39486855 PMC: 11611614. DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.2024-0951.


Juvenile Dermatomyositis: Updates in Pathogenesis and Biomarkers, Current Treatment, and Emerging Targeted Therapies.

Kim H Paediatr Drugs. 2024; 27(1):57-72.

PMID: 39425894 PMC: 11774970. DOI: 10.1007/s40272-024-00658-2.


References
1.
Bohan A, Peter J, Bowman R, Pearson C . Computer-assisted analysis of 153 patients with polymyositis and dermatomyositis. Medicine (Baltimore). 1977; 56(4):255-86. DOI: 10.1097/00005792-197707000-00001. View

2.
van der Meulen M, Bronner I, Hoogendijk J, Burger H, van Venrooij W, Voskuyl A . Polymyositis: an overdiagnosed entity. Neurology. 2003; 61(3):316-21. DOI: 10.1212/wnl.61.3.316. View

3.
Chiu Y, Co D . Juvenile dermatomyositis: immunopathogenesis, role of myositis-specific autoantibodies, and review of rituximab use. Pediatr Dermatol. 2011; 28(4):357-67. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1470.2011.01501.x. View

4.
Targoff I, Mamyrova G, Trieu E, Perurena O, Koneru B, OHanlon T . A novel autoantibody to a 155-kd protein is associated with dermatomyositis. Arthritis Rheum. 2006; 54(11):3682-9. DOI: 10.1002/art.22164. View

5.
DAgostino Sr R . The delayed-start study design. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(13):1304-6. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMsm0904209. View