Randomized Clinical Trial of the Iron-based Phosphate Binder PA21 in Hemodialysis Patients
Overview
Affiliations
Background And Objectives: A dose-finding study was undertaken to investigate the efficacy of PA21, a novel polynuclear iron(III)-oxyhydroxide phosphate binder.
Design, Setting, Participants, & Measurements: In a randomized, active-controlled, multicenter, open-label study at 50 clinical sites in Europe and the United States, hemodialysis patients were randomized to PA21 at dosages of 1.25, 5.0, 7.5, 10.0, or 12.5 g/d or sevelamer-HCl 4.8 g/d for 6 weeks. The primary efficacy endpoint was the change in serum phosphorus concentration from baseline.
Results: There were 154 participants who were randomized and received the study drug. All groups except PA21 1.25 g/d showed a significant decrease in serum phosphorus. Mean decreases in serum phosphorus in PA21 10 g/d and 12.5 g/d were -2.00±1.71 mg/dl and -1.69±1.81 mg/dl, respectively. A similar decrease to sevelamer-HCl (-1.06±1.35 mg/dl) was seen with PA21 5.0 g/d (-1.08±2.12 mg/dl) and 7.5 g/d (-1.25±1.21 mg/d). Overall, 60.9% of participants randomized to PA21 and 57.7% randomized to sevelamer-HCl reported ≥1 adverse event. The most frequent adverse events were hypophosphatemia (18.0%) and discolored feces (11.7%) for the pooled PA21 dose groups, and diarrhea, hypophosphatemia, and hypotension (each 11.5%) for sevelamer-HCl. Discontinuation due to adverse events occurred at a similar rate in PA21-treated (21.1%) and sevelamer-HCl-treated (23.1%) participants.
Conclusions: PA21 5-12.5 g/d significantly reduces serum phosphorus in hemodialysis patients. The 5 g/d and 7.5 g/d dosages showed similar efficacy to 4.8 g/d of sevelamer-HCl. The adverse events rate was similar for PA21 and sevelamer-HCl.
A network meta-analysis of therapies for hyperphosphatemia in CKD based on randomized trials.
Zheng C, Liu J, Wang T, Hu H, Chen Y Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):2012.
PMID: 39814766 PMC: 11736078. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-84942-8.
Georgopoulos C, Duni A, Stamellou E, Kitsos A, Gouva C, Dounousi E Hemodial Int. 2024; 29(1):6-16.
PMID: 39422162 PMC: 11730771. DOI: 10.1111/hdi.13187.
Liu J, Zuo L, Walpen S, Bernard L, Marty M, Enoiu M Nephron. 2023; 148(1):22-33.
PMID: 37473746 PMC: 10794965. DOI: 10.1159/000531869.
Impact of sucroferric oxyhydroxide on the oral and intestinal microbiome in hemodialysis patients.
Abdelbary M, Kuppe C, Said-Yekta Michael S, Kruger T, Floege J, Conrads G Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):9614.
PMID: 35689007 PMC: 9187715. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-13552-z.
Vervloet M, Boletis I, de Francisco A, Kalra P, Ketteler M, Messa P Clin Kidney J. 2021; 14(7):1770-1779.
PMID: 34221384 PMC: 8243278. DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfaa211.