» Articles » PMID: 23111595

Comparison of Solid-state and Submerged-state Fermentation for the Bioprocessing of Switchgrass to Ethanol and Acetate by Clostridium Phytofermentans

Overview
Date 2012 Nov 1
PMID 23111595
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The conversion of sustainable energy crops using microbiological fermentation to biofuels and bioproducts typically uses submerged-state processes. Alternatively, solid-state fermentation processes have several advantages when compared to the typical submerged-state processes. This study compares the use of solid-state versus submerged-state fermentation using the mesophilic anaerobic bacterium Clostridium phytofermentans in the conversion of switchgrass to the end products of ethanol, acetate, and hydrogen. A shift in the ratio of metabolic products towards more acetate and hydrogen production than ethanol production was observed when C. phytofermentans was grown under solid-state conditions as compared to submerged-state conditions. Results indicated that the end product concentrations (in millimolar) obtained using solid-state fermentation were higher than using submerged-state fermentation. In contrast, the total fermentation products (in weight of product per weight of carbohydrates consumed) and switchgrass conversion were higher for submerged-state fermentation. The conversion of xylan was greater than glucan conversion under both fermentation conditions. An initial pH of 7 and moisture content of 80 % resulted in maximum end products formation. Scanning electron microscopy study showed the presence of biofilm formed by C. phytofermentans growing on switchgrass under submerged-state fermentation whereas bacterial cells attached to surface and no apparent biofilm was observed when grown under solid-state fermentation. To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting consolidated bioprocessing of a lignocellulosic substrate by a mesophilic anaerobic bacterium under solid-state fermentation conditions.

Citing Articles

A review on xylanase sources, classification, mode of action, fermentation processes, and applications as a promising biocatalyst.

Abena T, Simachew A BioTechnologia (Pozn). 2024; 105(3):273-285.

PMID: 39439716 PMC: 11492895. DOI: 10.5114/bta.2024.141806.


Improvement of beauvericin production by Fusarium oxysporum AB2 under solid-state fermentation using an optimised liquid medium and co-cultures.

Vasquez-Bonilla J, Barranco-Florido J, Ponce-Alquicira E, Rincon-Guevara M, Loera O Mycotoxin Res. 2022; 38(3):175-183.

PMID: 35501595 DOI: 10.1007/s12550-022-00458-y.


Application of solid-state fermentation by microbial biotechnology for bioprocessing of agro-industrial wastes from 1970 to 2020: A review and bibliometric analysis.

Yafetto L Heliyon. 2022; 8(3):e09173.

PMID: 35368548 PMC: 8971590. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09173.


A Comprehensive Review on Valorization of Agro-Food Industrial Residues by Solid-State Fermentation.

Selo G, Planinic M, Tisma M, Tomas S, Komlenic D, Bucic-Kojic A Foods. 2021; 10(5).

PMID: 33922545 PMC: 8146281. DOI: 10.3390/foods10050927.


Impacts of biofilms on the conversion of cellulose.

Brethauer S, Shahab R, Studer M Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020; 104(12):5201-5212.

PMID: 32337627 PMC: 7275028. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-020-10595-y.