Comparison of Solid-state and Submerged-state Fermentation for the Bioprocessing of Switchgrass to Ethanol and Acetate by Clostridium Phytofermentans
Overview
Biotechnology
Microbiology
Affiliations
The conversion of sustainable energy crops using microbiological fermentation to biofuels and bioproducts typically uses submerged-state processes. Alternatively, solid-state fermentation processes have several advantages when compared to the typical submerged-state processes. This study compares the use of solid-state versus submerged-state fermentation using the mesophilic anaerobic bacterium Clostridium phytofermentans in the conversion of switchgrass to the end products of ethanol, acetate, and hydrogen. A shift in the ratio of metabolic products towards more acetate and hydrogen production than ethanol production was observed when C. phytofermentans was grown under solid-state conditions as compared to submerged-state conditions. Results indicated that the end product concentrations (in millimolar) obtained using solid-state fermentation were higher than using submerged-state fermentation. In contrast, the total fermentation products (in weight of product per weight of carbohydrates consumed) and switchgrass conversion were higher for submerged-state fermentation. The conversion of xylan was greater than glucan conversion under both fermentation conditions. An initial pH of 7 and moisture content of 80 % resulted in maximum end products formation. Scanning electron microscopy study showed the presence of biofilm formed by C. phytofermentans growing on switchgrass under submerged-state fermentation whereas bacterial cells attached to surface and no apparent biofilm was observed when grown under solid-state fermentation. To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting consolidated bioprocessing of a lignocellulosic substrate by a mesophilic anaerobic bacterium under solid-state fermentation conditions.
Abena T, Simachew A BioTechnologia (Pozn). 2024; 105(3):273-285.
PMID: 39439716 PMC: 11492895. DOI: 10.5114/bta.2024.141806.
Vasquez-Bonilla J, Barranco-Florido J, Ponce-Alquicira E, Rincon-Guevara M, Loera O Mycotoxin Res. 2022; 38(3):175-183.
PMID: 35501595 DOI: 10.1007/s12550-022-00458-y.
Yafetto L Heliyon. 2022; 8(3):e09173.
PMID: 35368548 PMC: 8971590. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09173.
A Comprehensive Review on Valorization of Agro-Food Industrial Residues by Solid-State Fermentation.
Selo G, Planinic M, Tisma M, Tomas S, Komlenic D, Bucic-Kojic A Foods. 2021; 10(5).
PMID: 33922545 PMC: 8146281. DOI: 10.3390/foods10050927.
Impacts of biofilms on the conversion of cellulose.
Brethauer S, Shahab R, Studer M Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2020; 104(12):5201-5212.
PMID: 32337627 PMC: 7275028. DOI: 10.1007/s00253-020-10595-y.