» Articles » PMID: 23102705

Focusing on Desired Outcomes of Care After Colon Cancer Resections; Hospital Variations in 'textbook Outcome'

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Date 2012 Oct 30
PMID 23102705
Citations 86
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aims: We propose a summarizing measure for outcome indicators, representing the proportion of patients for whom all desired short-term outcomes of care (a 'textbook outcome') is realized. The aim of this study was to investigate hospital variation in the proportion of patients with a 'textbook outcome' after colon cancer resections in the Netherlands.

Methods: Patients who underwent a colon cancer resection in 2010 in the Netherlands were included in the Dutch Surgical Colorectal Audit. A textbook outcome was defined as hospital survival, radical resection, no reintervention, no ostomy, no adverse outcome and a hospital stay < 14 days. We calculated the number of hospitals with a significantly higher (positive outlier) or lower (negative outlier) Observed/Expected (O/E) textbook outcome than average. As quality measures may be more discriminative in a low-risk population, analyses were repeated for low-risk patients only.

Results: A total of 5582 patients, treated in 82 hospitals were included. Average textbook outcome was 49% (range 26-71%). Eight hospitals were identified as negative outliers. In these hospitals a 'textbook outcome' was realized in 35% vs. 52% in average hospitals (p < 0.01). In a sub-analysis for low-risk patients, only one additional negative outlier was identified.

Conclusions: The textbook outcome, representing the proportion of patients with a perfect hospitalization, gives a simple comprehensive summary of hospital performance, while preventing indicator driven practice. Therewith the 'textbook outcome' is meaningful for patients, providers, insurance companies and healthcare inspectorate.

Citing Articles

Textbook outcome in ovarian cancer and its impact on survival: comparative study.

Carbonell-Morote S, Arjona-Sanchez A, Cascales-Campos P, Gonzalez-Gil A, Gomez-Duenas G, Gil-Gomez E World J Surg Oncol. 2025; 23(1):32.

PMID: 39893428 PMC: 11786506. DOI: 10.1186/s12957-025-03686-5.


Comparison of textbook outcomes between laparoscopic and open liver resection for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter study.

Luo S, Qin L, Qiu Z, Xie F, Zhang Y, Yu Y Surg Endosc. 2025; 39(3):2052-2061.

PMID: 39890613 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-025-11577-9.


Evolution of Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Change Point Analysis of Textbook Outcome over Twenty Years.

Park Y, Han H, Lim S, Joo H, Kim J, Kang M Medicina (Kaunas). 2025; 61(1.

PMID: 39858994 PMC: 11766512. DOI: 10.3390/medicina61010012.


Robotic-Assisted Colon Cancer Surgery: Faster Recovery and Less Pain Compared to Laparoscopy in a Retrospective Propensity-Matched Study.

Lin C, Liu Y, Chen C, Chen M, Chiu T, Huang Y Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(2).

PMID: 39858025 PMC: 11764117. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17020243.


DELTO Study: Delphi Consensus on Long-Term Textbook Outcome After Metabolic Bariatric Surgery.

Kuipers E, van der Laan L, Kaijser M, Timmerman J, Veeger N, van Beek A Obes Surg. 2025; 35(2):535-543.

PMID: 39826017 PMC: 11836189. DOI: 10.1007/s11695-024-07587-6.