» Articles » PMID: 23098762

A Randomized Double-blind Placebo-controlled Phase 2 Dose-ranging Study of OnabotulinumtoxinA in Men with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Overview
Journal Eur Urol
Specialty Urology
Date 2012 Oct 27
PMID 23098762
Citations 35
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Botulinum toxin treatment has been investigated as a minimally invasive alternative to oral medications in men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) suggestive of benign prostatic hyperplasia (LUTS/BPH).

Objective: To explore the efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U, 200 U, and 300 U versus placebo in men with LUTS/BPH in a phase 2 dose-ranging study.

Design, Setting, And Participants: A multicenter double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled 72-wk study enrolled men ≥ 50 yr of age with LUTS/BPH, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) ≥ 12, total prostate volume (TPV) 30-100ml, and maximum flow rate (Q(max)) 5-15 ml/s.

Intervention: Single transperineal (n=63) or transrectal (n=311) administration of placebo (n=94) or onabotulinumtoxinA 100 U (n=95), 200 U (n=94), or 300 U (n=97) into the prostate transition zone.

Outcome Measurements And Statistical Analysis: The primary efficacy end point was a change from baseline in IPSS at week 12. Secondary end points were Q(max), TPV, and transition zone volume (TZV). Analysis of covariance and the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel method assessed the efficacy and proportion of IPSS responders. Adverse events (AEs) were assessed.

Results And Limitations: Significant improvements from baseline in IPSS, Q(max), TPV, and TZV were observed for all groups, including placebo, at week 12 (p<0.001), with no significant differences between onabotulinumtoxinA and placebo. However, in an exploratory post hoc analysis, a significant reduction in IPSS versus placebo was observed with onabotulinumtoxinA 200 U in prior α-blocker users (n=180) at week 12. AEs were comparable across all groups.

Conclusions: Reductions in LUTS/BPH symptoms were seen in all groups, including placebo, with no significant between-group differences owing to a large placebo effect from the injectable therapy. The findings from the post hoc analysis in men previously treated with α-blockers will be further explored in an appropriately designed study.

Trial Registration: http://www.Clinical Trials.gov; NCT00284518.

Citing Articles

Comparative efficacy of commercial oral poly-herbal traditional Chinese medicine formulations combined with western medicine in benign prostatic hyperplasia management: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Zeng H, Wang Z, Zhu W, Li X, Liu B, Chen C Front Pharmacol. 2024; 15:1358340.

PMID: 38904002 PMC: 11187581. DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1358340.


[Botulinum toxin in male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS): What can we expect?].

Schonburg S Urologie. 2024; 63(7):653-657.

PMID: 38698262 DOI: 10.1007/s00120-024-02352-0.


extract for men with lower urinary tract symptoms: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Shin D, Zhu G, Tian W, Ahn S, Jeon S, Cho H Investig Clin Urol. 2023; 64(1):20-30.

PMID: 36629062 PMC: 9834572. DOI: 10.4111/icu.20220290.


Chinese botulinum toxin A for the treatment of lower urinary tract dysfunction: It works just as well.

Zhang F, Liu Q, Liao L, Li X, Zhang X Bladder (San Franc). 2022; 9(1):e47.

PMID: 36425077 PMC: 9680463. DOI: 10.14440/bladder.2022.847.


Clinical Application of Botulinum Neurotoxin in Lower-Urinary-Tract Diseases and Dysfunctions: Where Are We Now and What More Can We Do?.

Kuo H Toxins (Basel). 2022; 14(7).

PMID: 35878235 PMC: 9324011. DOI: 10.3390/toxins14070498.