» Articles » PMID: 23097235

Affective Scenes Influence Fear Perception of Individual Body Expressions

Overview
Journal Hum Brain Mapp
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Neurology
Date 2012 Oct 26
PMID 23097235
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In natural viewing conditions, different stimulus categories such as people, objects, and natural scenes carry relevant affective information that is usually processed simultaneously. But these different signals may not always have the same affective meaning. Using body-scene compound stimuli, we investigated how the brain processes fearful signals conveyed by either a body in the foreground or scenes in the background and the interaction between foreground body and background scene. The results showed that left and right extrastriate body areas (EBA) responded more to fearful than to neutral bodies. More interestingly, a threatening background scene compared to a neutral one showed increased activity in bilateral EBA and right-posterior parahippocampal place area (PPA) and decreased activity in right retrosplenial cortex (RSC) and left-anterior PPA. The emotional scene effect in EBA was only present when the foreground body was neutral and not when the body posture expressed fear (significant emotion-by-category interaction effect), consistent with behavioral ratings. The results provide evidence for emotional influence of the background scene on the processing of body expressions.

Citing Articles

Exploring neural mechanisms of gender differences in bodily emotion recognition: a time-frequency analysis and network analysis study.

Feng T, Mi M, Li D, Wang B, Liu X Front Neurosci. 2025; 18:1499084.

PMID: 39741530 PMC: 11685152. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1499084.


Differential contributions of body form, motion, and temporal information to subjective action understanding in naturalistic stimuli.

Smekal V, Solanas M, Fraats E, de Gelder B Front Integr Neurosci. 2024; 18:1302960.

PMID: 38533314 PMC: 10963482. DOI: 10.3389/fnint.2024.1302960.


Modality-specific brain representations during automatic processing of face, voice and body expressions.

Vaessen M, van der Heijden K, de Gelder B Front Neurosci. 2023; 17:1132088.

PMID: 37869514 PMC: 10587395. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2023.1132088.


Architectural experience influences the processing of others' body expressions.

Presti P, Galasso G, Ruzzon D, Avanzini P, Caruana F, Rizzolatti G Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023; 120(41):e2302215120.

PMID: 37782807 PMC: 10576150. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2302215120.


Age Effects in Emotional Memory and Associated Eye Movements.

Stam D, Colman L, Vansteelandt K, Vandenbulcke M, Van den Stock J Brain Sci. 2022; 12(12).

PMID: 36552178 PMC: 9776083. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci12121719.


References
1.
Schafer A, Schienle A, Vaitl D . Stimulus type and design influence hemodynamic responses towards visual disgust and fear elicitors. Int J Psychophysiol. 2005; 57(1):53-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2005.01.011. View

2.
Sander D, Grafman J, Zalla T . The human amygdala: an evolved system for relevance detection. Rev Neurosci. 2003; 14(4):303-16. DOI: 10.1515/revneuro.2003.14.4.303. View

3.
de Gelder B, Van den Stock J . The Bodily Expressive Action Stimulus Test (BEAST). Construction and Validation of a Stimulus Basis for Measuring Perception of Whole Body Expression of Emotions. Front Psychol. 2011; 2:181. PMC: 3152787. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00181. View

4.
Thorpe S, Fize D, Marlot C . Speed of processing in the human visual system. Nature. 1996; 381(6582):520-2. DOI: 10.1038/381520a0. View

5.
Van den Stock J, Tamietto M, Sorger B, Pichon S, Grezes J, de Gelder B . Cortico-subcortical visual, somatosensory, and motor activations for perceiving dynamic whole-body emotional expressions with and without striate cortex (V1). Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011; 108(39):16188-93. PMC: 3182696. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1107214108. View