Research Participants' Opinions of Delayed Consent for a Randomised Controlled Trial of Glucose Control in Intensive Care

Overview

Journal Intensive Care Med

Specialty Critical Care

Date 2012 Oct 26

PMID 23096429

Citations 23

Authors

J E Potter

S McKinley

A Delaney

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: Critically ill patients are often unable to give informed consent to participate in clinical research. A process of delayed consent, enrolling patients into clinical trials and obtaining consent as soon as practical from either the participant or their substitute decision maker, has sometimes been used. The objective of this study was to determine the opinion of participants, previously enrolled in the NICE-SUGAR study, of the delayed consent process.

Methods: This observational study was conducted from 2009 to 2010 in the ICU of a tertiary referral hospital in Australia. Participants who were enrolled in the NICE-SUGAR study with delayed consent who survived, were cognitively intact, and proficient in English were posted a questionnaire regarding their opinion of the delayed consent process. The questionnaire was returned by post, fax, email, or completed during a telephone interview.

Results: Of 298 eligible participants, 210 responded, with an overall response rate of 79 %. Delayed consent to participate in the NICE-SUGAR study was obtained from participants (57/210; 27.1 %) or the substitute decision maker (152/210; 72.4 %). Most respondents (195/204; 95.6 %) would have consented to participate in the NICE-SUGAR study if asked before enrolment; most (163/198; 82.3 %) ranked first "the person who consented on their behalf for the NICE Study" as most preferred to make decisions, should they be unable; and most (177/202; 87.6 %) agreed with the decision made by their relative.

Conclusion: Delayed consent to participate in a clinical trial that includes critically ill patients is acceptable from research participant's perspectives.

Citing Articles

Protocol implementation during the COVID-19 pandemic: experiences from a randomized trial of stress ulcer prophylaxis.

Dennis B, Deane A, Lauzier F, Zytaruk N, Hardie M, Hammond N BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024; 24(1):109.

PMID: 38704520 PMC: 11069460. DOI: 10.1186/s12874-024-02233-2.

Perspectives of ICU Patients on Deferred Consent in the Context of Post-ICU Quality of Life: A Substudy of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

van der Wal L, Grim C, Del Prado M, van Westerloo D, Schultz M, Helmerhorst H Crit Care Med. 2024; 52(5):694-703.

PMID: 38180043 PMC: 11008447. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006184.

[Proposal for participation in intensive care and emergency medicine studies for patients unable to give informed consent (Cologne Model)].

Kochanek M, Grass G, Boll B, Eichenauer D, Shimabukuro-Vornhagen A, Hallek M Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed. 2023; 119(5):391-397.

PMID: 37773455 PMC: 11129979. DOI: 10.1007/s00063-023-01063-2.

Protocol for Deferral of Consent in Acute Stroke Trials.

Faris H, Dewar B, Fedyk M, Dowlatshahi D, Menon B, Swartz R Neurology. 2022; 100(6):292-300.

PMID: 36414423 PMC: 9946194. DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000201533.

Learning from stakeholders to inform good practice guidance on consent to research in intensive care units: a mixed-methods study.

Paddock K, Woolfall K, Kearney A, Pattison N, Frith L, Gamble C BMJ Open. 2022; 12(11):e066149.

PMID: 36375987 PMC: 9664286. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066149.

References

Stephenson A, Baker S, Zeps N . Attitudes of relatives of patients in intensive care and emergency departments to surrogate consent to research on incapacitated participants. Crit Care Resusc. 2007; 9(1):40-50. View

Finfer S, Bellomo R, Boyce N, French J, Myburgh J, Norton R . A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350(22):2247-56. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa040232. View

Pochard F, Azoulay E, Chevret S, Lemaire F, Hubert P, Canoui P . Symptoms of anxiety and depression in family members of intensive care unit patients: ethical hypothesis regarding decision-making capacity. Crit Care Med. 2001; 29(10):1893-7. DOI: 10.1097/00003246-200110000-00007. View

Scales D, Smith O, Pinto R, Barrett K, Friedrich J, Lazar N . Patients' preferences for enrolment into critical-care trials. Intensive Care Med. 2009; 35(10):1703-12. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-009-1552-y. View

Annane D, Outin H, Fisch C, Bellissant E . The effect of waiving consent on enrollment in a sepsis trial. Intensive Care Med. 2004; 30(2):321-324. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-003-2065-8. View

Bellomo R, Cass A, Cole L, Finfer S, Gallagher M, Lo S . Intensity of continuous renal-replacement therapy in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2009; 361(17):1627-38. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0902413. View

Pochard F, Darmon M, Fassier T, Bollaert P, Cheval C, Coloigner M . Symptoms of anxiety and depression in family members of intensive care unit patients before discharge or death. A prospective multicenter study. J Crit Care. 2005; 20(1):90-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2004.11.004. View

Coppolino M, Ackerson L . Do surrogate decision makers provide accurate consent for intensive care research?. Chest. 2001; 119(2):603-12. DOI: 10.1378/chest.119.2.603. View

Burns K, Zubrinich C, Marshall J, Cook D . The 'Consent to Research' paradigm in critical care: challenges and potential solutions. Intensive Care Med. 2009; 35(10):1655-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-009-1562-9. View

10.

Mehta S, Quittnat Pelletier F, Brown M, Ethier C, Wells D, Burry L . Why substitute decision makers provide or decline consent for ICU research studies: a questionnaire study. Intensive Care Med. 2011; 38(1):47-54. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-011-2411-1. View

11.

Ciroldi M, Cariou A, Adrie C, Annane D, Castelain V, Cohen Y . Ability of family members to predict patient's consent to critical care research. Intensive Care Med. 2007; 33(5):807-813. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-007-0582-6. View

12.

Burns K, Magyarody N, Duffett M, Nisenbaum R, Cook D . Attitudes of the general public toward alternative consent models. Am J Crit Care. 2010; 20(1):75-83. DOI: 10.4037/ajcc2010645. View

13.

Cooke C, Erickson S, Watkins T, Matthay M, Hudson L, Rubenfeld G . Age-, sex-, and race-based differences among patients enrolled versus not enrolled in acute lung injury clinical trials. Crit Care Med. 2010; 38(6):1450-7. PMC: 3799957. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181de451b. View

14.

Finfer S, Chittock D, Su S, Blair D, Foster D, Dhingra V . Intensive versus conventional glucose control in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2009; 360(13):1283-97. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810625. View

15.

McAdam J, Dracup K, White D, Fontaine D, Puntillo K . Symptom experiences of family members of intensive care unit patients at high risk for dying. Crit Care Med. 2010; 38(4):1078-85. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181cf6d94. View