Effects of Body Position and Loading Modality on Muscle Activity and Strength in Shoulder Presses
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Little is known about the effect of performing upper-body resistance exercises with dumbbells versus barbells and standing versus seated. Therefore, this study sought to compare electromyogram activity (EMG) and one-repetition maximum (1-RM) in barbell and dumbbell shoulder presses performed seated and standing. Fifteen healthy men volunteered for 1-RM and EMG testing with a load corresponding to 80% of the 1-RM. Electromyogram activity was measured in the anterior, medial, and posterior deltoids and biceps and triceps brachii. The following EMG differences or trends were observed: For deltoid anterior: ~11% lower for seated barbell versus dumbbell (p = 0.038), ~15% lower in standing barbell versus dumbbell (p < 0.001), ~8% lower for seated versus standing dumbbells (p = 0.070); For medial deltoid, ~7% lower for standing barbell versus dumbbells (p = 0.050), ~7% lower for seated versus standing barbell (p = 0.062), 15% lower for seated versus standing dumbbell (p = 0.008); For posterior deltoid: ~25% lower for seated versus standing barbell (p < 0.001), ~24% lower for seated versus standing dumbbells (p = 0.002); For biceps, ~33% greater for seated barbell versus dumbbells (p = 0.002), 16% greater for standing barbell versus dumbbell (p = 0.074), ~23% lower for seated versus standing dumbbells (p < 0.001); For triceps, ~39% greater for standing barbell versus dumbbells (p < 0.001), ~20% lower for seated versus standing barbell (p = 0.094). 1-RM strength for standing dumbbells was ~7% lower than standing barbell (p = 0.002) and ~10% lower than seated dumbbells (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the exercise with the greatest stability requirement (standing and dumbbells) demonstrated the highest neuromuscular activity of the deltoid muscles, although this was the exercise with the lowest 1-RM strength.
Bravi M, Fossati C, Giombini A, Mannacio E, Borzuola R, Papalia R J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2023; 8(2).
PMID: 37092377 PMC: 10123673. DOI: 10.3390/jfmk8020045.
Blazkiewicz M, Hadamus A Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(24).
PMID: 36560129 PMC: 9781216. DOI: 10.3390/s22249762.
Lorenz D Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2022; 17(7):1430-1441.
PMID: 36518828 PMC: 9718688. DOI: 10.26603/001c.39796.
Bench, Bar, and Ring Dips: Do Kinematics and Muscle Activity Differ?.
McKenzie A, Crowley-McHattan Z, Meir R, Whitting J, Volschenk W Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(20).
PMID: 36293792 PMC: 9603242. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192013211.
Coratella G, Tornatore G, Longo S, Esposito F, Ce E Front Physiol. 2022; 13:825880.
PMID: 35936912 PMC: 9354811. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.825880.