» Articles » PMID: 23096062

Effects of Body Position and Loading Modality on Muscle Activity and Strength in Shoulder Presses

Overview
Specialty Physiology
Date 2012 Oct 26
PMID 23096062
Citations 17
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Little is known about the effect of performing upper-body resistance exercises with dumbbells versus barbells and standing versus seated. Therefore, this study sought to compare electromyogram activity (EMG) and one-repetition maximum (1-RM) in barbell and dumbbell shoulder presses performed seated and standing. Fifteen healthy men volunteered for 1-RM and EMG testing with a load corresponding to 80% of the 1-RM. Electromyogram activity was measured in the anterior, medial, and posterior deltoids and biceps and triceps brachii. The following EMG differences or trends were observed: For deltoid anterior: ~11% lower for seated barbell versus dumbbell (p = 0.038), ~15% lower in standing barbell versus dumbbell (p < 0.001), ~8% lower for seated versus standing dumbbells (p = 0.070); For medial deltoid, ~7% lower for standing barbell versus dumbbells (p = 0.050), ~7% lower for seated versus standing barbell (p = 0.062), 15% lower for seated versus standing dumbbell (p = 0.008); For posterior deltoid: ~25% lower for seated versus standing barbell (p < 0.001), ~24% lower for seated versus standing dumbbells (p = 0.002); For biceps, ~33% greater for seated barbell versus dumbbells (p = 0.002), 16% greater for standing barbell versus dumbbell (p = 0.074), ~23% lower for seated versus standing dumbbells (p < 0.001); For triceps, ~39% greater for standing barbell versus dumbbells (p < 0.001), ~20% lower for seated versus standing barbell (p = 0.094). 1-RM strength for standing dumbbells was ~7% lower than standing barbell (p = 0.002) and ~10% lower than seated dumbbells (p < 0.001). In conclusion, the exercise with the greatest stability requirement (standing and dumbbells) demonstrated the highest neuromuscular activity of the deltoid muscles, although this was the exercise with the lowest 1-RM strength.

Citing Articles

Do the Testing Posture and the Grip Modality Influence the Shoulder Maximal Voluntary Isometric Contraction?.

Bravi M, Fossati C, Giombini A, Mannacio E, Borzuola R, Papalia R J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2023; 8(2).

PMID: 37092377 PMC: 10123673. DOI: 10.3390/jfmk8020045.


The Effect of the Weight and Type of Equipment on Shoulder and Back Muscle Activity in Surface Electromyography during the Overhead Press-Preliminary Report.

Blazkiewicz M, Hadamus A Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(24).

PMID: 36560129 PMC: 9781216. DOI: 10.3390/s22249762.


Progressive Loading in a Strongman Following Distal Biceps Repair: Re-Thinking Load Progression - A Case Report.

Lorenz D Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2022; 17(7):1430-1441.

PMID: 36518828 PMC: 9718688. DOI: 10.26603/001c.39796.


Bench, Bar, and Ring Dips: Do Kinematics and Muscle Activity Differ?.

McKenzie A, Crowley-McHattan Z, Meir R, Whitting J, Volschenk W Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(20).

PMID: 36293792 PMC: 9603242. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192013211.


Front vs Back and Barbell vs Machine Overhead Press: An Electromyographic Analysis and Implications For Resistance Training.

Coratella G, Tornatore G, Longo S, Esposito F, Ce E Front Physiol. 2022; 13:825880.

PMID: 35936912 PMC: 9354811. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2022.825880.