» Articles » PMID: 23089139

Bone Mineral Density in Children and Young Adults with Neurofibromatosis Type 1

Overview
Specialties Endocrinology
Oncology
Date 2012 Oct 24
PMID 23089139
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Concern for impaired bone health in children with neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1) has led to increased interest in bone densitometry in this population. Our study assessed bone mineral apparent density (BMAD) and whole-body bone mineral content (BMC)/height in pediatric patients with NF-1 with a high plexiform neurofibroma burden. Sixty-nine patients with NF-1 (age range 5.2-24.8; mean 13.7 ± 4.8 years) were studied. Hologic dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry scans (Hologic, Inc., Bedford, MA, USA) were performed on all patients. BMD was normalized to derive a reference volume by correcting for height through the use of the BMAD, as well as the BMC. BMAD of the lumbar spine (LS 2-4), femoral neck (FN), and total body BMC/height were measured and Z-scores were calculated. Impaired bone mineral density was defined as a Z-score ≤-2. Forty-seven percent of patients exhibited impaired bone mineral density at any bone site, with 36% at the LS, 18% at the FN, and 20% total BMC/height. BMAD Z-scores of the LS (-1.60 ± 1.26) were more impaired compared with both the FN (-0.54 ± 1.58; P=0.0003) and the whole-body BMC/height Z-scores (-1.16 ± 0.90; P=0.036). Plexiform neurofibroma burden was negatively correlated with LS BMAD (r(s)=-0.36, P=0.01). In pediatric and young adult patients with NF-1, LS BMAD was more severely affected than the FN BMAD or whole-body BMC/height.

Citing Articles

Anthropometric measurements of children with neurofibromatosis type I: impact of plexiform neurofibroma volume and treatment.

Lemberg K, Gross A, Sproule L, Liewehr D, Dombi E, Baldwin A Pediatr Res. 2024; .

PMID: 39198589 DOI: 10.1038/s41390-024-03474-z.


Potential endpoints for assessment of bone health in persons with neurofibromatosis type 1.

Gross A, Plotkin S, Watts N, Fisher M, Klesse L, Lessing A Clin Trials. 2023; 21(1):29-39.

PMID: 37772407 PMC: 10920397. DOI: 10.1177/17407745231201338.


Bone Mineral Density in Neurofibromatosis Type 1: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Charoenngam N, Wattanachayakul P, Jaroenlapnopparat A, Ungprasert P, Chenbhanich J Calcif Tissue Int. 2023; 113(2):166-174.

PMID: 37221347 DOI: 10.1007/s00223-023-01094-z.


Endocrine system involvement in patients with RASopathies: A case series.

Siano M, Pivonello R, Salerno M, Falco M, Mauro C, De Brasi D Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022; 13:1030398.

PMID: 36483002 PMC: 9724702. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2022.1030398.


Bone metabolism in patients with type 1 neurofibromatosis: key role of sun exposure and physical activity.

Ferrara U, Tortora C, Rosano C, Assunto A, Rossi A, Pagano S Sci Rep. 2022; 12(1):4368.

PMID: 35288591 PMC: 8921306. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-07855-4.


References
1.
Evans D, Howard E, Giblin C, Clancy T, Spencer H, Huson S . Birth incidence and prevalence of tumor-prone syndromes: estimates from a UK family genetic register service. Am J Med Genet A. 2010; 152A(2):327-32. DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.33139. View

2.
Thakkar S, Feigen U, Mautner V . Spinal tumours in neurofibromatosis type 1: an MRI study of frequency, multiplicity and variety. Neuroradiology. 1999; 41(9):625-9. DOI: 10.1007/s002340050814. View

3.
Oken M, Creech R, Tormey D, Horton J, Davis T, McFadden E . Toxicity and response criteria of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Am J Clin Oncol. 1982; 5(6):649-55. View

4.
Brinker M, OConnor D . The incidence of fractures and dislocations referred for orthopaedic services in a capitated population. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86(2):290-7. View

5.
Gutmann D, Aylsworth A, Carey J, Korf B, Marks J, Pyeritz R . The diagnostic evaluation and multidisciplinary management of neurofibromatosis 1 and neurofibromatosis 2. JAMA. 1997; 278(1):51-7. View