» Articles » PMID: 23087622

The Social-sensory Interface: Category Interactions in Person Perception

Overview
Date 2012 Oct 23
PMID 23087622
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Research is increasingly challenging the claim that distinct sources of social information-such as sex, race, and emotion-are processed in discrete fashion. Instead, there appear to be functionally relevant interactions that occur. In the present article, we describe research examining how cues conveyed by the human face, voice, and body interact to form the unified representations that guide our perceptions of and responses to other people. We explain how these information sources are often thrown into interaction through bottom-up forces (e.g., phenotypic cues) as well as top-down forces (e.g., stereotypes and prior knowledge). Such interactions point to a person perception process that is driven by an intimate interface between bottom-up perceptual and top-down social processes. Incorporating data from neuroimaging, event-related potentials (ERP), computational modeling, computer mouse-tracking, and other behavioral measures, we discuss the structure of this interface, and we consider its implications and adaptive purposes. We argue that an increased understanding of person perception will likely require a synthesis of insights and techniques, from social psychology to the cognitive, neural, and vision sciences.

Citing Articles

Normativity vs. uniqueness: effects of social relationship strength on neural representations of others.

Guthrie T, Chavez R Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci. 2024; 19(1).

PMID: 38915187 PMC: 11232616. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsae045.


How facial aging affects perceived gender: Insights from maximum likelihood conjoint measurement.

Fitousi D J Vis. 2021; 21(12):12.

PMID: 34812837 PMC: 8626850. DOI: 10.1167/jov.21.12.12.


Understanding the Impact of Face Masks on the Processing of Facial Identity, Emotion, Age, and Gender.

Fitousi D, Rotschild N, Pnini C, Azizi O Front Psychol. 2021; 12:743793.

PMID: 34803825 PMC: 8595128. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.743793.


Stereotypical Processing of Emotional Faces: Perceptual and Decisional Components.

Fitousi D Front Psychol. 2021; 12:733432.

PMID: 34777118 PMC: 8578932. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.733432.


Empathy-Related Responses to Depicted People in Art Works.

Kesner L, Horacek J Front Psychol. 2017; 8:228.

PMID: 28286487 PMC: 5323429. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00228.


References
1.
McClelland J . Stochastic interactive processes and the effect of context on perception. Cogn Psychol. 1991; 23(1):1-44. DOI: 10.1016/0010-0285(91)90002-6. View

2.
Fox E, Mathews A, Calder A, Yiend J . Anxiety and sensitivity to gaze direction in emotionally expressive faces. Emotion. 2007; 7(3):478-86. PMC: 2757723. DOI: 10.1037/1528-3542.7.3.478. View

3.
Adams Jr R, Gordon H, Baird A, Ambady N, Kleck R . Effects of gaze on amygdala sensitivity to anger and fear faces. Science. 2003; 300(5625):1536. DOI: 10.1126/science.1082244. View

4.
Campanella S, Belin P . Integrating face and voice in person perception. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007; 11(12):535-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.10.001. View

5.
Becker D, Kenrick D, Neuberg S, Blackwell K, Smith D . The confounded nature of angry men and happy women. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007; 92(2):179-90. DOI: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.2.179. View