» Articles » PMID: 23086535

An Investigation of the Construct Validity of the ICECAP-A Capability Measure

Overview
Journal Qual Life Res
Date 2012 Oct 23
PMID 23086535
Citations 60
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the construct validity of the ICECAP-A capability wellbeing measure.

Methods: A face-to-face interview-administered survey was conducted with 418 members of the UK general population, randomly sampled from the Postcode Address File. Pre-specified hypotheses were developed about the expected associations between individuals' ICECAP-A responses and their socio-economic circumstances, health and freedom. The hypotheses were investigated using statistical tests of association.

Results: The ICECAP-A responses and scores reflected differences across different health and socioeconomic groups as anticipated, but did not distinguish individuals by the level of local deprivation. Mean ICECAP-A scores reflected individuals' perceived freedom slightly more closely than did measures of health and happiness.

Conclusion: This study suggests that the ICECAP-A measure can identify expected differences in capability wellbeing in a general population sample. Further work could establish whether self-reported capabilities exhibit desirable validity and acceptability in sub-groups of the population such as patients, social care recipients and informal carers.

Citing Articles

What aspects of health and wellbeing are most important to parent carers of children with disabilities?.

McGlinchey C, Harniess P, Borek A, Garrood A, McDonald A, Boyle F Health Expect. 2024; 27(3):e14085.

PMID: 38845158 PMC: 11156688. DOI: 10.1111/hex.14085.


Economic evaluation of dialysis and comprehensive conservative care for chronic kidney disease using the ICECAP-O and EQ-5D-5L; a comparison of evaluation instruments.

Zahirian Moghadam T, Powell J, Sharghi A, Zandian H Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2023; 21(1):81.

PMID: 37924060 PMC: 10625205. DOI: 10.1186/s12962-023-00491-3.


Antidepressants for the prevention of depression following first-episode psychosis (ADEPP): study protocol for a multi-centre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.

Palmer E, Griffiths S, Watkins B, Weetman T, Ottridge R, Patel S Trials. 2023; 24(1):646.

PMID: 37803384 PMC: 10557320. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07499-3.


Braving the waves: exploring capability well-being patterns in seven European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Himmler S, van Exel J, Brouwer W, Neumann-Bohme S, Sabat I, Schreyogg J Eur J Health Econ. 2023; 25(4):563-578.

PMID: 37410345 PMC: 11136820. DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01604-8.


Phase II, double blind, placebo controlled, multi-site study to evaluate the safety, feasibility and desirability of conducting a phase III study of anamorelin for anorexia in people with small cell lung cancer: A study protocol (LUANA trial).

Sousa M, Martin P, Johnson M, Lind M, Maddocks M, Bullock A PLoS One. 2023; 18(5):e0285850.

PMID: 37195996 PMC: 10191352. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0285850.


References
1.
Flynn T, Chan P, Coast J, Peters T . Assessing quality of life among British older people using the ICEPOP CAPability (ICECAP-O) measure. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2011; 9(5):317-29. DOI: 10.2165/11594150-000000000-00000. View

2.
Al-Janabi H, Flynn T, Coast J . Development of a self-report measure of capability wellbeing for adults: the ICECAP-A. Qual Life Res. 2011; 21(1):167-76. PMC: 3254872. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-011-9927-2. View

3.
Coast J, Peters T, Natarajan L, Sproston K, Flynn T . An assessment of the construct validity of the descriptive system for the ICECAP capability measure for older people. Qual Life Res. 2008; 17(7):967-76. DOI: 10.1007/s11136-008-9372-z. View

4.
Flynn T, Huynh E, Peters T, Al-Janabi H, Clemens S, Moody A . Scoring the Icecap-a capability instrument. Estimation of a UK general population tariff. Health Econ. 2013; 24(3):258-69. PMC: 4322472. DOI: 10.1002/hec.3014. View

5.
Coast J, Smith R, Lorgelly P . Should the capability approach be applied in health economics?. Health Econ. 2008; 17(6):667-70. DOI: 10.1002/hec.1359. View