Tinnitus Assessment by Means of Standardized Self-report Questionnaires: Psychometric Properties of the Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ), the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), and Their Short Versions in an International and Multi-lingual Sample

Overview

Journal Health Qual Life Outcomes

Publisher Biomed Central

Specialty Public Health

Date 2012 Oct 20

PMID 23078754

Citations 43

Authors

Florian Zeman

Michael Koller

Martin Schecklmann

Berthold Langguth

Michael Landgrebe

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Background: Tinnitus research in an international context requires standardized and validated questionnaires in different languages. The aim of the present set of analyses was the reassessment of basic psychometric properties according to classical test theory of self-report instruments that are being used within the multicentre Tinnitus Research Initiative (TRI) database project.

Methods: 1318 patients of the TRI Database were eligible for the analyses. The basic psychometric properties reliability, validity, and sensitivity of Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ) and Tinnitus Beeinträchtigungs Fragebogen (i.e., Tinnitus Impairment Questionnaire, TBF-12) were assessed by the use of Cronbach's alpha, corrected item-total correlations, correlation coefficients and standardized response means.

Results: Throughout the languages, all questionnaires showed high internal consistencies (Cronbach's alpha > 0.79) and solid item-total correlations, as well as high correlations among themselves (around 0.8) and in combination with the self-reported tinnitus severity. However, some paradoxical correlations between individual items of the TBF-12, constructed as a shortform of the THI, and the corresponding THI-items were seen. Standardized Response Means (SRM) were low if tinnitus did not change, and between 0.3 and 1.09 for improved or worsened tinnitus complaints, indicating the sensitivity of the measures.

Conclusions: All investigated instruments have high internal consistency, high convergence and discriminant validity and good change sensitivity in an unselected large multinational clinical sample and thus appear appropriate to evaluate the effects of tinnitus treatments in a cross-cultural context.

Citing Articles

Establishing a core domain set for early-phase clinical trials of electrical stimulation interventions for tinnitus in adults: an online Delphi study.

Labree B, Hoare D, Fackrell K, Hall D, Gascoyne L, Sereda M BMJ Open. 2025; 15(3):e079769.

PMID: 40037669 PMC: 11881199. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079769.

Tinnitus after treatment of vestibular schwannoma: a systematic review and comparative analysis of microsurgery and stereotactic radiosurgery.

Govindaraj R, Chambers C, Kha M, Sullivan T, Chawla S, Zacest A J Neurooncol. 2025; .

PMID: 39969785 DOI: 10.1007/s11060-024-04935-5.

Clinical and audiological characteristics in adults with tinnitus in South Africa.

Khoza-Shangase K, Mkhize S S Afr J Commun Disord. 2024; 71(1):e1-e11.

PMID: 39625085 PMC: 11622119. DOI: 10.4102/sajcd.v71i1.1069.

Tinnitus Guidelines and Their Evidence Base.

Langguth B, Kleinjung T, Schlee W, Vanneste S, Ridder D J Clin Med. 2023; 12(9).

PMID: 37176527 PMC: 10178961. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12093087.

A Bibliometric Analysis of Publications on Tinnitus: A Study Based on Web of Science Data From 1980 to 2020.

Yaz F, Buttner M, Tekin A, Bahsi I, Topsakal V J Int Adv Otol. 2023; 19(2):121-129.

PMID: 36648030 PMC: 10152108. DOI: 10.5152/iao.2023.22082.

References

Zeman F, Koller M, Figueiredo R, Aazevedo A, Rates M, Coelho C . Tinnitus handicap inventory for evaluating treatment effects: which changes are clinically relevant?. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011; 145(2):282-7. DOI: 10.1177/0194599811403882. View

Newman C, Sandridge S, Jacobson G . Psychometric adequacy of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) for evaluating treatment outcome. J Am Acad Audiol. 1998; 9(2):153-60. View

Landgrebe M, Zeman F, Koller M, Eberl Y, Mohr M, Reiter J . The Tinnitus Research Initiative (TRI) database: a new approach for delineation of tinnitus subtypes and generation of predictors for treatment outcome. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010; 10:42. PMC: 2920857. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-42. View

Langguth B, Kleinjung T, Landgrebe M . Tinnitus: the complexity of standardization. Eval Health Prof. 2011; 34(4):429-33. DOI: 10.1177/0163278710394337. View

Kam A, Cheung A, Chan P, Leung E, Wong T, Tong M . Psychometric properties of a Chinese (Cantonese) version of the Tinnitus Questionnaire. Int J Audiol. 2009; 48(8):568-75. DOI: 10.1080/14992020902822047. View

Zachariae R, Mirz F, Johansen L, Andersen S, Bjerring P, Pedersen C . Reliability and validity of a Danish adaptation of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory. Scand Audiol. 2000; 29(1):37-43. DOI: 10.1080/010503900424589. View

Newman C, Jacobson G, Spitzer J . Development of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996; 122(2):143-8. DOI: 10.1001/archotol.1996.01890140029007. View

Greimel K, Leibetseder M, Unterrainer J, Albegger K . [Can tinnitus be measured? Methods for assessment of tinnitus-specific disability and presentation of the Tinnitus Disability Questionnaire]. HNO. 1999; 47(3):196-201. DOI: 10.1007/s001060050382. View

Cronlein T, Langguth B, Geisler P, Hajak G . Tinnitus and insomnia. Prog Brain Res. 2007; 166:227-33. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(07)66021-X. View

10.

Hiller W, Goebel G . Rapid assessment of tinnitus-related psychological distress using the Mini-TQ. Int J Audiol. 2005; 43(10):600-4. DOI: 10.1080/14992020400050077. View

11.

Landgrebe M, Binder H, Koller M, Eberl Y, Kleinjung T, Eichhammer P . Design of a placebo-controlled, randomized study of the efficacy of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of chronic tinnitus. BMC Psychiatry. 2008; 8:23. PMC: 2358898. DOI: 10.1186/1471-244X-8-23. View

12.

Gorman S, Radtka S, Melnick M, Abrams G, Byl N . Development and validation of the Function In Sitting Test in adults with acute stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2010; 34(3):150-60. DOI: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e3181f0065f. View

13.

Langguth B, Goodey R, Azevedo A, Bjorne A, Cacace A, Crocetti A . Consensus for tinnitus patient assessment and treatment outcome measurement: Tinnitus Research Initiative meeting, Regensburg, July 2006. Prog Brain Res. 2007; 166:525-36. PMC: 4283806. DOI: 10.1016/S0079-6123(07)66050-6. View

14.

Hallam R, Jakes S, Hinchcliffe R . Cognitive variables in tinnitus annoyance. Br J Clin Psychol. 1988; 27(3):213-22. DOI: 10.1111/j.2044-8260.1988.tb00778.x. View

15.

Goebel G, Hiller W . [The tinnitus questionnaire. A standard instrument for grading the degree of tinnitus. Results of a multicenter study with the tinnitus questionnaire]. HNO. 1994; 42(3):166-72. View

16.

Ghulyan-Bedikian V, Paolino M, Giorgetti-DEsclercs F, Paolino F . [Psychometric properties of a French adaptation of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory]. Encephale. 2010; 36(5):390-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.encep.2009.12.007. View

17.

Passi S, Ralli G, Capparelli E, Mammone A, Scacciatelli D, Cianfrone G . The THI questionnaire: psychometric data for reliability and validity of the Italian version. Int Tinnitus J. 2008; 14(1):26-33. View

18.

Monzani D, Genovese E, Marrara A, Gherpelli C, Pingani L, Forghieri M . Validity of the Italian adaptation of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory; focus on quality of life and psychological distress in tinnitus-sufferers. Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2008; 28(3):126-34. PMC: 2644986. View

19.

Schmidt L, Teixeira V, Dalligna C, Dallagnol D, Smith M . Brazilian Portuguese Language version of the "Tinnitus Handicap Inventory": validity and reproducibility. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2007; 72(6):808-10. PMC: 9442134. DOI: 10.1016/s1808-8694(15)31048-x. View

20.

Hiller W, Goebel G . A psychometric study of complaints in chronic tinnitus. J Psychosom Res. 1992; 36(4):337-48. DOI: 10.1016/0022-3999(92)90070-i. View