» Articles » PMID: 23077445

Outcome of MRI-guided Vacuum-assisted Breast Biopsy - Initial Experience at Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia

Overview
Journal Radiol Oncol
Publisher Sciendo
Specialties Oncology
Radiology
Date 2012 Oct 19
PMID 23077445
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Like all breast imaging modalities MRI has limited specificity and the positive predictive value for lesions detected by MRI alone ranges between 15 and 50%. MRI guided procedures (needle biopsy, presurgical localisation) are mandatory for suspicious findings visible only at MRI, with potential influence on therapeutic decision. The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate our initial clinical experience with MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy as an alternative to surgical excision and to investigate the outcome of MRI-guided breast biopsy as a function of the MRI features of the lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS.: In 14 women (median age 51 years) with 14 MRI-detected lesions, MRI-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy was performed. We evaluated the MRI findings that led to biopsy and we investigated the core and postoperative histology results and follow-up data.

Results: The biopsy was technically successful in 14 (93%) of 15 women. Of 14 biopsies in 14 women, core histology revealed 6 malignant (6/14, 43%), 6 benign (6/14, 43%) and 2 high-risk (2/14, 14%) lesions. Among the 6 cancer 3 were invasive and 3 were ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). The probability of malignancy in our experience was higher for non-mass lesion type and for washout and plateau kinetics.

Conclusions: Our initial experience confirms that MRI-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy is fast, safe and accurate alternative to surgical biopsy for breast lesions detected at MRI only.

Citing Articles

Innovative strategies for minimizing hematoma risk in MRI-guided breast biopsies.

Bronnimann M, McMurray M, Heverhagen J, Christe A, Wyss C, Peters A Radiol Oncol. 2025; 59(1):91-99.

PMID: 39840427 PMC: 11867564. DOI: 10.2478/raon-2025-0004.


Performance Benchmark Metrics and Clinicopathologic Outcomes of MRI-Guided Breast Biopsies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Ozcan B, Yan J, Xi Y, Baydoun S, Scoggins M, Dogan B Eur J Breast Health. 2023; 19(1):1-27.

PMID: 36605469 PMC: 9806944. DOI: 10.4274/ejbh.galenos.2022.2022-12-1.


Recent Progress for the Techniques of MRI-Guided Breast Interventions and their applications on Surgical Strategy.

Gao P, Kong X, Song Y, Song Y, Fang Y, Ouyang H J Cancer. 2020; 11(16):4671-4682.

PMID: 32626513 PMC: 7330700. DOI: 10.7150/jca.46329.


A magnetic resonance image-guided breast needle intervention robot system: overview and design considerations.

Park S, Kim J, Lim K, Yoon C, Kim D, Kang H Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2017; 12(8):1319-1331.

PMID: 28168682 DOI: 10.1007/s11548-017-1528-2.


The usefulness of F-18 FDG PET/CT-mammography for preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison with conventional PET/CT and MR-mammography.

Moon E, Lim S, Han Y, Jeong Y, Kang Y, Jeong H Radiol Oncol. 2013; 47(4):390-7.

PMID: 24294185 PMC: 3814285. DOI: 10.2478/raon-2013-0031.

References
1.
Zebic-Sinkovec M, Kadivec M, Podobnik G, Skof E, Snoj M . Mammographycally occult high grade ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) as second primary breast cancer, detected with MRI: a case report. Radiol Oncol. 2012; 44(4):228-31. PMC: 3423706. DOI: 10.2478/v10019-010-0033-9. View

2.
Miklavcic D, Towhidi L . Numerical study of the electroporation pulse shape effect on molecular uptake of biological cells. Radiol Oncol. 2012; 44(1):34-41. PMC: 3423672. DOI: 10.2478/v10019-010-0002-3. View

3.
Heywang-Kobrunner S, Sinnatamby R, Lebeau A, Lebrecht A, Britton P, Schreer I . Interdisciplinary consensus on the uses and technique of MR-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy (VAB): results of a European consensus meeting. Eur J Radiol. 2008; 72(2):289-94. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.07.010. View

4.
Tozaki M, Yamashiro N, Sakamoto M, Sakamoto N, Mizuuchi N, Fukuma E . Magnetic resonance-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results in 100 Japanese women. Jpn J Radiol. 2010; 28(7):527-33. DOI: 10.1007/s11604-010-0464-7. View

5.
Goto M, Ito H, Akazawa K, Kubota T, Kizu O, Yamada K . Diagnosis of breast tumors by contrast-enhanced MR imaging: comparison between the diagnostic performance of dynamic enhancement patterns and morphologic features. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006; 25(1):104-12. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.20812. View