» Articles » PMID: 23074419

Internet-based Device-assisted Remote Monitoring of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices: an Evidence-based Analysis

Overview
Date 2012 Oct 18
PMID 23074419
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Citing Articles

Analysis of 1051 ICD Leads Extractions in Search of Factors Affecting Procedure Difficulty and Complications: Number of Coils, Tip Fixation and Position-Does It Matter?.

Kutarski A, Jachec W, Stefanczyk P, Brzozowski W, Glowniak A, Nowosielecka D J Clin Med. 2024; 13(5).

PMID: 38592112 PMC: 10931966. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13051261.


Wearable heart rate variability and atrial fibrillation monitoring to improve clinically relevant endpoints in cardiac surgery-a systematic review.

Zillner L, Andreas M, Mach M Mhealth. 2024; 10:8.

PMID: 38323143 PMC: 10839520. DOI: 10.21037/mhealth-23-19.


The Current Status of Telemedicine Technology Use Across the World Health Organization European Region: An Overview of Systematic Reviews.

Saigi-Rubio F, Borges do Nascimento I, Robles N, Ivanovska K, Katz C, Azzopardi-Muscat N J Med Internet Res. 2022; 24(10):e40877.

PMID: 36301602 PMC: 9650581. DOI: 10.2196/40877.


Remote Monitoring of CIEDs-For Both Safety, Economy and Convenience?.

Lappegard K, Moe F Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19(1).

PMID: 35010572 PMC: 8751026. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19010312.


Assessing Communication during Remote Follow-Up of Users with Pacemakers in Norway: The NORDLAND Study, a Randomized Trial.

Catalan-Matamoros D, Lopez-Villegas A, Lappegard K, Lopez-Liria R Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(20).

PMID: 33096736 PMC: 7589429. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17207678.


References
1.
Ellery S, Pakrashi T, Paul V, Sack S . Predicting mortality and rehospitalization in heart failure patients with home monitoring--the Home CARE pilot study. Clin Res Cardiol. 2006; 95 Suppl 3:III29-35. DOI: 10.1007/s00392-006-1306-6. View

2.
Freedenberg V, Thomas S, Friedmann E . Anxiety and depression in implanted cardioverter-defibrillator recipients and heart failure: a review. Heart Fail Clin. 2010; 7(1):59-68. DOI: 10.1016/j.hfc.2010.08.008. View

3.
Crossley G, Chen J, Choucair W, Cohen T, Gohn D, Ben Johnson W . Clinical benefits of remote versus transtelephonic monitoring of implanted pacemakers. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 54(22):2012-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.10.001. View

4.
Mullens W, Oliveira L, Verga T, Wilkoff B, Tang W . Insights from internet-based remote intrathoracic impedance monitoring as part of a heart failure disease management program. Congest Heart Fail. 2010; 16(4):159-63. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7133.2010.00149.x. View

5.
Schoenfeld M . Transtelephonic versus remote monitoring of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: is one approach to be preferred?. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 54(22):2020-2. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2009.09.019. View